281 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 1 of 15
-
Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · May 12, 2017
Stockton v. Ford Motor Company (2017)
The Court of Appeals vacated the $3.4 million judgment for Joyce and Ronnie Stockton against Ford Motor Company and remanded, because the jury instructions and verdict form omitted required questions on whether the product was…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Utah · January 18, 2013
Smith v. Ford Motor Company (2013)
The district court granted Ford Motor Company's motion to exclude the testimony of plaintiff's expert, Dr. Samuel Hammar, finding his "every exposure" causation opinion inadmissible, which went against plaintiff Linda Smith. An expert's…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · March 14, 2014
Durham v. Ford Motor Company (2014)
…judgment and partial summary judgment for Ford Motor Company on both the plaintiff's appeal and Ford's cross-appeal, rejecting the Durham estate's premises and products claims and Ford's request for total immunity…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 26, 2014
Scott v. Ford Motor Company (2014)
The court affirmed the judgment and compensatory damages for Patrick and Sharon Scott against Ford Motor Co. on the failure to warn claims, and reversed the ruling that barred punitive damages, remanding for a trial on…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · March 22, 2019
Ford Motor Company v. Sheets (2019)
…trial court's one-sentence order denying Ford Motor Company's summary judgment motion and remanded for the trial court to state the basis for its ruling, leaving Ford's up-the-ladder immunity claim undecided…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · October 7, 2011
Rehm v. Ford Motor Company (2011)
The Court of Appeals affirmed the jury verdict and judgment for Ford Motor Company against the Rehm family, and held Ford's cross-appeal moot while addressing its merits. Evidence rulings are reviewed for abuse of…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 21, 2012
Campbell v. Ford Motor Company (2012)
The Court of Appeal reversed the judgment for plaintiff Honer (continued by her daughter Mary Campbell) against Ford, holding Ford owed her no duty, so Ford prevailed. Under the Rowland factors as clarified in Cabral, an…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 29, 2011
Adams v. Ford Motor Company (2011)
…so Ford Motor Company keeps its award of costs including $167,570 in expert witness fees after its defense verdict. A prevailing defendant's section 998 offer is presumed reasonable when it wins a more favorable…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · December 28, 2018
Michel v. Ford Motor Company (2018)
The court granted Cummins's and Ford's motion to exclude plaintiffs' experts Dr. Brody and Dr. Castleman for late disclosure of their reports and denied plaintiffs' motion to amend the scheduling order. Under Rule 37…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · May 19, 2014
Rost v. Ford Motor Company (2014)
The Superior Court affirmed the judgment for Richard and Joyce Rost against Ford Motor Company, rejecting Ford's appeal and the Rosts' cross-appeal. Betz v. Pneumo Abex does not bar all 'any exposure' expert opinion…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · October 27, 2016
Bristol v. Ford Motor Company (2016)
…is presumed to have acted in good faith, and the defendant did not rebut that presumption. Venue, Removal and Transfer; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: Ford dealership mechanic at a Ford dealership Ford dealership 1972-1989
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · April 27, 2012
Pease v. Ford Motor Company (2012)
The district court adopted the Special Master's report, rejected Crane Company's objections, and denied Crane's second motion for summary judgment, so the plaintiffs' claims against Crane continued. A transferee MDL court's earlier…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 5, 2017
Petitpas v. Ford Motor Company (2017)
…of Appeal affirmed the judgment for Exxon Mobil, Ford and Rossmoor, rejecting plaintiffs' challenges to the summary adjudication for Exxon, the nonsuit for Rossmoor, the jury instructions on Ford, and the defense verdict for Exxon. An…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Utah · September 9, 2014
Anderson v. Ford Motor Company (2014)
Joseph Anderson, Jr. sued in Utah state court, alleging he had asbestos-caused mesothelioma. The case was removed to federal court and transferred to the asbestos multidistrict litigation in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Mr. Anderson died of…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · August 28, 2018
Michel v. Ford Motor Company (2018)
Victor Michel, a Louisiana citizen, sued many companies in state court in 2017 after being diagnosed with mesothelioma. He had worked from 1965 to 2005 as a parts delivery driver, truck mechanic, generator service technician and…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Utah · February 28, 2014
Anderson v. Ford Motor Company (2014)
Joseph Anderson Jr. sued in state court, and the case was removed to federal court in Utah. He alleged asbestos-caused mesothelioma and died of it in 2008. His wife Arva Anderson, as executor, took over as plaintiff. After the case returned from the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Utah · July 1, 2013
Anderson v. Ford Motor Company (2013)
Joseph Anderson Jr. sued Ford Motor Company and other defendants over his mesothelioma. After he died on June 7, 2008, his wife and executor, Arva Anderson, took over as plaintiff. The opinion does not describe where…
-
Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · April 21, 2017
Walls v. Ford Motor Co. (In re Asebestos Litigation, 2017)
…affirmed the Superior Court's judgment for Ford Motor Company, holding any error in the partial summary judgment on third-party replacement brake parts was harmless because the jury found Ford not negligent. An error in…
-
Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · December 2, 2019
Knecht v. Ford Motor Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
The Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the denial of Ford's motion for judgment as a matter of law and its inconsistent-verdict challenge, but reversed on the excessive-damages ruling and remanded so the Superior Court…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · November 22, 2016
Rost v. Ford Motor Co. (2016)
…affirmed the judgment for the Rost estates against Ford Motor Company, holding that the causation testimony was proper and that, although consolidation with two other cases was error, Ford showed no prejudice. An expert may tell…