15 results for “Ford Motor Company”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · September 27, 2019
Ratcliff v. American Honda Motor Co. Inc. (2019)
The magistrate judge recommended granting summary judgment to Ford, Brenntag Specialties, Whittaker Clark & Daniels and Honeywell because Ratcliff's claims were time-barred, and recommended terminating the other pending motions as moot. Under North Carolina law…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · November 1, 2018
Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair, Inc. (2018)
The court granted Ford Motor Company's Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss the plaintiffs' alternative-causation claims with prejudice and their fraud, concealment and aiding-and-abetting conspiracy claims without prejudice, and allowed the…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · August 20, 2015
Oddo v. Asbestos Corporation Ltd. (2015)
…affirmed Ford's liability, reallocated fault to Ford 65%, Union Carbide 25% and Higgins 10%, and amended the survival damages award against Ford, so the plaintiffs lost against Southern Talc but kept their judgment against Ford…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · February 11, 2019 · in the opinion
Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair Inc. (2019)
…Jeffrey P. Hubbard, HUBBARD, MITCHELL, WILLIAMS & STRAIN, PLLC & Stacey L. Strain, HUBBARD, MITCHELL, WILLIAMS & STRAIN, PLLC. Ford Motor Company, Defendant, represented by Amber Barlow, KUCHLER, POLK, WEINER, LLC, pro hac vice, Janika D. Polk, KUCHLER POLK…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · February 8, 2019 · in the opinion
Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair, Inc. (2019)
…Jeffrey P. Hubbard, HUBBARD, MITCHELL, WILLIAMS & STRAIN, PLLC & Stacey L. Strain, HUBBARD, MITCHELL, WILLIAMS & STRAIN, PLLC. Ford Motor Company, Defendant, represented by Amber Barlow, KUCHLER, POLK, WEINER, LLC, pro hac vice, Janika D. Polk, KUCHLER POLK…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 8, 2018 · in the opinion
Alfaro v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. (Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2018)
…the determination of whether these fees were reasonably necessary, are issues left to the discretion of the trial court." (Adams v. Ford Motor Co. (2011) 199 Cal.App.4th 1475, 1484 \[132 Cal.Rptr.3d 424…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas · October 24, 2019 · in the opinion
Williams v. Avon Products, Inc. (2019)
…2:17-CV-86, 2017 WL 3033425, at [\4] (S.D. Tex. July 18, 2017) (quoting Garcia v. Ford Motor Co., No. 1:12-CV-181, 2013 WL 12137090, at [\3] (S.D. Tex. May 10…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · March 15, 2019 · in the opinion
Douglas v. Imerys Talc America, Inc. (2019)
…be proper under § 1441(a) even if venue might have been improper in the state court prior to removal. Id.; see also Becker v. Ford Motor Co., No. 4:07CV1573 FRB, 2007 WL 4404168, at [\1…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 19, 2018 · in the opinion
Shulman v. Brenntag N. AM., Inc. (2018)
…of fact exist as to whether JJBP used by Ms. Shulman was contaminated with asbestos and defective, or unsuited for its purpose (See Denny v. Ford Motor Co., 87 N.Y. 2d 248, 662 N.E…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 13, 2018 · in the opinion
Garrido v. Johnson & Johnson (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…of fact exist as to whether JJBP used by Mrs. Garrido was contaminated with asbestos and defective, or unsuited for its purpose (See Denny v. Ford Motor Co., 87 N.Y. 2d 248, 662 N.E…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 14, 2018 · in the opinion
Rothlein v. Johnson & Johnson (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…fact exist as to whether the JBP used by Mr. Rothlein was contaminated with asbestos and defective, or unsuited for its purpose (See Denny v. Ford Motor Co., 87 N.Y. 2d 248, 662 N.E…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 28, 2019 · in the opinion
Olson v. Brenntag N. AM. Inc. (2019)
…414 F Supp 255, 264-265 \[ED Pa 1976\]; Bennett v Greeley Gas Co., 969 P2d 754, 761 \[Colo App 1998\]; Byers v Santiam Ford, Inc., 281 Or 411, 416, 574 P2d 1122, 1124-1125 \[1978…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · February 26, 2019 · in the opinion
Shanahan v. Kolmar Laboratories, Inc. (2019)
…as a successor-in-interest to Whittaker, Clark & Daniels, Inc., Defendants, represented by Daniel Robert Kuszmerski, Barrett, Lazar & Lincoln, LLC. Cyprus Amax Minerals Company, Imerys Talc America, Inc., individually, Imerys USA, Inc. & Imerys Talc Vermont, Inc.…
-
Court case · Montana Workers' Comp. Court · September 26, 2018 · in the opinion
Atchley v. Louisiana Pacific Corp. (2018)
…inspected for demolition on March 31, 1997, this Court finds that Edward's employment terminated prior to October 1, 1997, while the 1995 ODA was in effect. Ford v. Sentry Cas. Co., 2012 MT 156, ¶ 32…
-
Court case · Montana Workers' Comp. Court · March 21, 2019 · in the opinion
Rosling v. Associated Loggers Exchange (2019)
…his hazardous exposure and OD, and the court therefore applied the ODA in effect on the date in which the period of employment which included his last injurious exposure ended.). \[4\] Ford v. Sentry Cas. Co.…