No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

20 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · August 30, 2013

    Morgan v. Bill Vann Company, Inc. (2013)

    The court granted General Electric's motion for summary judgment and dismissed the plaintiff's claims against GE with prejudice, finding the pre-1979 exposure claims time-barred and no sufficient evidence of later exposure to…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · September 30, 2013

    Morgan v. Bill Vann Company, Inc. (2013)

    …Morgan's motions for Rule 54(b) final judgment and for a stay, so he could not immediately appeal the summary judgments for Crane Co., General Electric, Warren Pumps and CBS; the case against John Crane…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · January 28, 2010 · in the opinion

    Corley v. Long-Lewis, Inc. (2010)

    …Elliot Turbomachinery Co., 545 F.Supp.2d 1266, 1273 (S.D.Fla.2008) (citing Nesbiet v. General Electric Co., 399 F.Supp.2d 205, 212 (S.D.N.Y.2005)). Although these arguments may undermine the…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · September 29, 2015 · in the opinion

    Bobo v. Tennessee Valley Authority (2015)

    …also was the first nuclear plant to generate more than one billion watts of electric power.\[30\] The plant's three operating units are General Electric boiling water reactors. They produce electricity by splitting uranium atoms…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · September 13, 2012 · in the opinion

    Brown v. the Boeing Company (2012)

    …under submission. DONE and ORDERED. \[1\] Plaintiff's complaint also named CBS Corporation (f/k/a Viacom, Inc.), DAP Products, Inc., General Electric Company, Georgia-Pacific LLC, Goodrich Corporation, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, RT Vanderbilt Company…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · June 22, 2015 · in the opinion

    Bobo v. Tennessee Valley Authority (2015)

    …units are General Electric boiling water reactors. They produce electricity by splitting uranium atoms, and the heat generated by that process boils water, producing steam that is piped to turbines, which spin generators to produce electricity.…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · August 30, 2013 · in the opinion

    Morgan v. Bill Vann Company, Inc. (2013)

    …other defendants after May 19, 1979. But applicable law imposes on plaintiff the burden of proving exposure to each particular defendant's products, not just proving exposure to asbestos in general. See, e.g., Hoffman v…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · August 30, 2013 · in the opinion

    Morgan v. Bill Vann Company, Inc. (2013)

    The only evidence cited by plaintiff for such a proposition is general testimony that "every manufacturer has the recommended spare parts in their OEM manuals that the store room would generate their list of in-stock…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · October 29, 2013 · in the opinion

    Bobo v. Agco Corp. (2013)

    …\[and\] ... an implied restriction of the general authority is necessary to avoid grave interference with the performance of a governmental function, or that for other reasons it was plainly the purpose of Congress to use the…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · October 28, 2013 · in the opinion

    Bobo v. Agco Corporation (2013)

    ….. an implied restriction of the general authority is necessary to avoid grave interference with the performance of a governmental function, or that for other reasons it was plainly the purpose of Congress to use the \sue…

  11. Court case · Alabama Supreme Court · December 16, 2011 · in the opinion

    Bradberry v. Carrier Corporation ET AL. (2011)

    \[8\] An exception to the general rule that the automatic stay does not apply to solvent codefendants has been recognized in certain "unusual circumstances" that are not present in this case. See A.H. Robbins Co…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · August 25, 2014 · in the opinion

    Bobo v. Tennessee Valley Authority (2014)

    …Mrs. Bobo's contraction of pleural mesothelioma from laundering her husband's work clothes, purportedly containing asbestos dust originating from his job duties at TVA's Browns Ferry Nuclear power general facility in Limestone County, Alabama…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · February 25, 2019 · in the opinion

    Smith v. Avon Products, Inc. (2019)

    … 12-15) Thus, none of these Defendants are subject to general jurisdiction in Alabama. \[4\] Plaintiff also takes issue with Downey's reliance on a summary of sales records he was given prior to his deposition…

  14. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit · April 26, 2017 · in the opinion

    Bobo v. Tennessee Valley Authority (2017)

    …AL, for Plaintiffs-Appellees. James S. Chase, Edward C. Meade, Edwin Warren Small, Tennessee Valley Authority, Office of General Counsel, KNOXVILLE, TN, for Defendant-Appellant. Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, JORDAN, Circuit Judge, and LAMBERTH,\[\\] District…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · August 30, 2013 · in the opinion

    Morgan v. Bill Vann Company, Inc. (2013)

    …other defendants after May 19, 1979. But applicable law imposes on plaintiff the burden of proving exposure to each particular defendant's products, not just proving exposure to asbestos in general. See, e.g., Hoffman v…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · March 24, 2016 · in the opinion

    Holland v. Airco, Inc. (2016)

    …Judge Robreno because regardless of what causation standard applies, it is a general principle of Alabama tort law that the plaintiff bears the burden of submitting evidence proving that the defendant caused his injuries. See Turner…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · February 21, 2014 · in the opinion

    McGUFFIE v. Mead Corporation (2014)

    …. ." Generally, "the affairs of CAPCO will be under the general management of the board of directors of six individuals, of whom three will always be designated by Asarco\[, despite its minority stock position\]."\[24\] The CAPCO…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · August 30, 2013 · in the opinion

    Morgan v. Bill Vann Company, Inc. (2013)

    …asbestos-containing packing and/or gaskets were offered until the mid-1980s." (Doc. 314-7, at 2.) \[7\] As a general proposition, when asked whether the actual pumps at Alabama River Pulp contained asbestos, Morgan responded…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · September 29, 2011 · in the opinion

    Kite v. Bill Vann Company, Inc. (2011)

    …her under color of such office. . . ." (Complaint at 13-14). It is this language on which the plaintiff relies for his disclaimer argument. As a general matter, "the plaintiff \[is\] the master of the claim. . . ." Caterpillar…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · August 30, 2013 · in the opinion

    Morgan v. Bill Vann Company, Inc. (2013)

    …manufactured by other defendants after May 19, 1979. As discussed supra, however, applicable law imposes on plaintiff the burden of proving exposure to each particular defendant's products, not just proving exposure to asbestos in general.