7 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Arizona · August 8, 2011
Leabo v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2011)
The federal district court granted General Electric's Rule 12(c) motion, joined by MetLife, and dismissed the plaintiffs' wrongful death action with prejudice as barred by res judicata, so the plaintiffs lost. Under Arizona law…
-
Court case · Arizona Supreme Court · May 10, 2017
City of Phoenix v. Glenayre Electronics, Inc. (2017)
…claims. The Arizona Supreme Court held that the statute applies to government entities despite the general exemption of the state from limitations periods and the common-law doctrine that time does not run against the government…
-
Court case · Arizona Supreme Court · May 11, 2018 · in the opinion
Quiroz v. Alcoa Inc. (2018)
First, whether it falls under the general auspices of "negligence" or "liability," both the Family and the dissent are in fact using cases and Restatement sections premised on foreseeability to create a new duty. Second, by…
-
Court case · Arizona Supreme Court · August 21, 2013 · in the opinion
Pounders v. Enserch E & C, Inc. (2013)
…light of § 175's comment (a), which states that "the law applicable to wrongful death is selected by the same principles as control selection of the law applicable to personal injuries in general (see § 146)." ¶ 20…
-
Court case · Arizona Court of Appeals · May 19, 2016 · in the opinion
City of Phoenix v. Glenayre Electronics, Inc. (2016)
…of contract. Whether A.R.S. § 12-341.01(A) applies to the City's claims is a question of statutory interpretation which we review de novo. Chaurasia v. General Motors Corp., 212 Ariz. 18, 26, ¶…
-
Court case · Arizona Court of Appeals · April 17, 2012 · in the opinion
Pounders v. Enserch E & C, Inc. (2012)
…1971) ("The fact ... that one of the parties is domiciled ... in a given state will usually carry little weight of itself."); Ferren v. General Motors Corp., 137 N.H. 423, 427, 628 A.2d 265 (1993…
-
Court case · Arizona Court of Appeals · September 20, 2016 · in the opinion
Quiroz v. Alcoa Inc. (2016)
…that "\[a\]n actor ordinarily has a duty to exercise reasonable care when the actor's conduct creates a risk of physical harm," and imposes a general duty of reasonable care on all persons. Restatement (Third) …