No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

3 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Colorado · March 19, 2019 · in the opinion

    Mestas v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)

    …Pump Division, FMC CORPORATION, sued as successor of Northern Pumps and Peerless Pumps, GARDNER DENVER, INC., GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, GENUINE PARTS COMPANY a/k/a NAPA, sued individually and d/b/a Rayloc Brakes, GRINNELL, LLC…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Colorado · January 2, 2013 · in the opinion

    Church v. Dana Kepner Company, Inc. (2013)

    …standing to file motions to quash the challenged subpoenas. The general rule is that a party has no standing to quash a subpoena served upon a third party, except as to claims of privilege or upon…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Colorado · September 16, 2012 · in the opinion

    Church v. Dana Kepner Company, Inc. (2012)

    …even if Plaintiff's allegations were true, the information conveyed by Johns Manville "would only have provided Dana Kepner with knowledge of the dangerous characteristics of asbestos in a general sense" (id. at 10 (emphasis added)…