25 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2
-
Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · June 20, 2018 · in the opinion
Bechtel Corporation v. Batchelor (2018)
…Ford Motor Company, Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, General Electric Company, Genuine Parts Company, Gould Pumps, Inc., Honeywell International, Inc., Union Carbide Corporation, Westinghouse Electric Corporation, FPL, and Bechtel.\[1\] The complaint gives a short description of…
-
Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · December 27, 2017 · in the opinion
Bechtel Corporation v. Batchelor (2017)
…Ford Motor Company, Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, General Electric Company, Genuine Parts Company, Gould Pumps, Inc., Honeywell International, Inc., Union Carbide Corporation, Westinghouse Electric Corporation, FPL, and Bechtel.\[1\] The complaint gives a short description of…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · August 2, 2012 · in the opinion
Faddish v. Buffalo Pumps (2012)
…U.S. at 534, 115 S.Ct. 1043; Reynolds v. General Electric Co., 2012 WL 2835500 (E.D.Pa.2012). On the other hand, if the worker's exposure was primarily land based, then, even if…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · July 11, 2016 · in the opinion
Waite v. Aii Acquisition Corp. (2016)
…591, 113 S.Ct. 2786). "For example, there is no fit where a large analytical leap must be made between the facts and the opinion." Id. (citing General Electric Co. v. Joiner, 522 U.S. 136…
-
Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · November 9, 2016 · in the opinion
Crane Co. v. DeLisle (2016)
…Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993), General Electric Co. v. Joiner, 522 U.S. 136, 118 S.Ct. 512, 139 L.Ed.2d 508…
-
Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · February 22, 2017 · in the opinion
Kelly v. Georgia-Pacific, LLC (2017)
…asbestos fibers — were inhaled and became embedded in the lungs of the plaintiffs without their knowledge or consent. This, like the electric shock suffered by the plaintiff in Clark \[v. Choctawhatchee, 107 So.2d 609 (Fla…
-
Court case · Florida Supreme Court · July 8, 2011 · in the opinion
American Optical Corporation v. Spiewak (2011)
…does not accrue, for limitations purposes, until the injured party discovers or has a "duty to discover the act constituting an invasion of his legal rights." Creviston v. General Motors Corp., 225 So. 2d 331, 334 …
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit · August 23, 2018
Waite v. Aii Acquisition Corp. (2018)
…tort, and a corporation is not at home in a state, or deemed to consent to general jurisdiction, merely by substantial business there or by registering and appointing a service agent under Florida law. Personal Jurisdiction…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida · July 10, 2018
Stevenson v. Cyprus Amax Minerals Co. (2018)
…in part that the Florida federal court lacked personal jurisdiction over it. The plaintiff conceded there was no general jurisdiction and argued for specific jurisdiction. She relied on the predecessor's Florida business registration and registered…
-
Court case · Florida Supreme Court · October 15, 2018 · in the opinion
DeLisle v. Crane Co. (2018)
…in every proceeding. However, this Court's case law makes clear that a proper and thorough application of Frye allows the trial judge to inquire [\1235] beyond bare assertions of general acceptance. Daubert, on the other…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · October 19, 2014 · in the opinion
Oneal v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2014)
…Court must consider whether Oneal's claims are governed by federal admiralty law or by state law. In general, admiralty law applies to a tort action when the alleged tort occurred on navigable waters and the…
-
Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · May 17, 2017 · in the opinion
Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft v. Jones (2017)
…Jurisdiction and Minimum Contacts Mrs. Jones concedes that general jurisdiction does not lie and that she is proceeding only on a theory of specific jurisdiction under section 48.193(1)(a)(6), which provides for specific…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida · March 29, 2016 · in the opinion
Dugas v. 3M Company (2016)
…basic training, Mr. Dugas was assigned to be an aviation structural mechanic or metal-smith ("AMS"). Id. His job duties were general aircraft maintenance, which included documenting and repairing defects. Id. at 20-21. The Navy…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida · September 25, 2018 · in the opinion
Doolin v. Ford Motor Company (2018)
…401 F.3d at 1242. The four criteria are as follows: (1) has the toxic substance in question been demonstrated to cause the type of illness or disease in question (general causation), (2) was the individual…
-
Court case · Florida Supreme Court · October 29, 2015 · in the opinion
Aubin v. Union Carbide Corporation (2015)
…jury instructions pertaining to the duty to warn. Aubin requested the trial court to include a general instruction that Union Carbide had the duty to warn the end user, while Union Carbide asserted that it was…
-
Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · September 6, 2017 · in the opinion
Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation v. Britt (2017)
…reliable methodology and peer-reviewed, published studies, and the general acceptance by the scientific community of the relationship between the inhalation of asbestos fibers and mesothelioma, distinguish the present case from the rejection, based on Daubert…
-
Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · July 25, 2018 · in the opinion
Southern Wall Products v. Bolin (2018)
…fairness divorced from traditional practice cannot transform a judgment rendered in the absence of authority into law. As a general rule, the sovereign's exercise of power requires some act by which the defendant "purposefully avails…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · May 9, 2016 · in the opinion
Batchelor v. American Optical Corp. (2016)
…2d 1315, 1329 (N.D.Ala. 2010). Marley and Carroll involved plaintiffs who asserted general disclaimers with respect to all federal claims while, at the same time, pursuing asbestos claims based on plaintiffs' naval service. Marley…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · April 30, 2014 · in the opinion
Peruyero v. Airbus Sas (2014)
…that Fla. Stat. § 48.193, which confers general jurisdiction, is the applicable long-arm statute because BAE engaged in "substantial and not isolated" activity in Florida. Pl.'s Resp. to Def.'s Mot. Dismiss at 6…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · August 1, 2014 · in the opinion
Rothchild v. Crane Co. (2014)
…467 U.S. 69, 73 (1984). As a general rule, the Court must "limit\[\] its consideration to the pleadings and exhibits attached thereto" when deciding a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss. Grossman v. Nationsbank…