23 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas · September 29, 2016
In re Reed (2016)
Barbara Reed was diagnosed with mesothelioma in 2016 and had her right lung removed. She said she was exposed to asbestos from 1971 to 1976 while working in the Plastics Mold Cleaning and Bakelight Departments at the Square D plant in Cedar Rapids,…
-
Court case · Texas Supreme Court · July 3, 2014 · in the opinion
Union Carbide Corporation v. Synatzske (2014)
…Corporation; General Electric Company; General Refractories Company; Grefco, Inc.; Henry Vogt Machine Company; Ingersoll-Rand Company; Owens-Illinois, Inc.; Rapid American Corporation; Riley Power, Inc.; Triplex, Inc.; Ametek, Inc.; Uniroyal, Inc.; Viacom, Inc.; Westinghouse Electric Corporation…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas · September 14, 2016 · in the opinion
Cooper Industries, LLC v. Precision Castparts Corp. (2016)
Glock, Ges.m.b.H., 227 F.3d 308, 311 (5th Cir. 2000) (citing Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co., 61 S. Ct. 1020, 1021-22 (1941)); Smith v. EMC Corp., 393 F.3d 590…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 31, 2017 · in the opinion
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company v. Rogers (2017)
…In 1980, Goodyear sampled materials. In 1983, Goodyear took six samples from maintenance electricians. Over half of the total samples were taken in 1985, after asbestos abatement efforts had begun. Goodyear trained its employee Ray Jackson…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas · December 5, 2017 · in the opinion
Acevedo v. Abraham (2017)
…16-3 at p. 59);\[2\] and he once terminated an electrocardiogram ("EKG") because the nurse who was administering it did not smile at him when he asked her to (Dkt. 16-3 at p. 42).…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · May 20, 2010
Uop, LLC v. Kozak (2010)
…to-warn claim against an engineering firm when the claim rests on the firm's engineering knowledge and expertise, whether the firm is sued as designer or as general contractor. Failure to Warn; Choice of Law…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 23, 2019
Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. v. Dickson (2019)
…of risk viewed prospectively and that the employer was actually, subjectively aware of that risk to the plaintiff. General knowledge of asbestos hazards, and later studies, did not show Bell's awareness of an extreme risk…
-
Court case · Texas Supreme Court · July 11, 2014 · in the opinion
Bostic v. Georgia-Pacific Corp. (2014)
If the plaintiff proves general causation with reliable scientific evidence that approximately 400 milligrams of the medication can cause death in children, the plaintiff will be able to prove specific causation in at least two ways…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 26, 2010 · in the opinion
Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. Bostic (2010)
Maddox's opinion is insufficient as to specific causation. Id. at 839. Here, appellees endeavor to rely on material practice simulation studies performed by their general causation expert, William Longo, Ph.D., a material scientist. Dr…
-
Court case · Texas Supreme Court · October 22, 2010 · in the opinion
Robinson v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc. (2010)
…Constitution, which states: To guard against transgressions of the high powers herein delegated, we declare that everything in this "Bill of Rights" is excepted out of the general powers of government, and shall forever remain inviolate…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · June 18, 2012 · in the opinion
Union Carbide Corporation v. Synatzske (2012)
…City of Austin, in which the Texas Supreme Court explained, The general rule is that when a statute is repealed without a savings clause limiting the effect of the repeal, the repeal of that statute is…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · February 25, 2010 · in the opinion
Smith v. Kelly-Moore Paint Company, Inc. (2010)
…cases of asbestosis and asbestos exposure, such that asbestos exposure in any amount other than general background levels would appear to be causative of mesothelioma,\[4\] we cannot read Borg-Warner, and the test announced therein…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas · July 25, 2015 · in the opinion
Erica P. John Fund, Inc. v. Halliburton Company (2015)
…the Court will focus on the analyst reports addressing the December 7 announcement and Halliburton's argument that general uncertainty in the asbestos environment caused Halliburton's statistically significant price decline. Allen argues that none of…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · December 28, 2018 · in the opinion
Jefferson County v. Farris (2018)
…the Local Government Code appears in Chapter 89, entitled "General Provisions Relating to County Administration," and it provides for "Presentation of Claim": (a) Except as provided by Subsection (c), a person may not file suit on…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · June 30, 2011 · in the opinion
Union Carbide Corporation v. Synatzske (2011)
…effect, it cannot be granted thereafter. A like general rule is that if a right to recover depends entirely upon a statute, its repeal deprives the court of jurisdiction over the subject matter. 135 Tex. 95…
-
Court case · Texas Supreme Court · May 8, 2015 · in the opinion
Abutahoun v. Dow Chemical Company (2015)
…Thereafter, the Court adopted the RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF TORTS § 414 (1977) approach for imposing liability on a property owner or general contractor that controls the work of an independent contractor who is negligently injured. See Redinger…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of Texas · March 21, 2011 · in the opinion
In re Placid Oil Company (2011)
…form of notice Placid was required to give the Post-Confirmation Tort Claimants to satisfy due process requirements and ultimately discharge their claims. In general, for unknown creditors whose identities and claims are not reasonably ascertainable…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · June 28, 2012 · in the opinion
Union Carbide Corp. v. Synatzske (2012)
…effect, it cannot be granted thereafter. A like general rule is that if a right to recover depends entirely upon a statute, its repeal deprives the court of jurisdiction over the subject matter. 135 Tex. 95…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · January 22, 2015 · in the opinion
In re EI DU Pont DE Nemours and Company (2015)
…a preponderance of the evidence or even affirmative evidence, because to require such would incorrectly shift the burden of proof. Clophus v. General Motors Corp., 769 S.W.2d 669, 670 (Tex. App.-Houston \[14th Dist.…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas · October 24, 2019 · in the opinion
Williams v. Avon Products, Inc. (2019)
…limiting products liability actions against nonmanufacturing sellers. Section 82.003 established a general rule that a nonmanufacturing seller is not liable for harm caused by a defective product. This limitation was enacted to protect "innocent sellers…