No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

16 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia · November 19, 2015 · in the opinion

    Wilson v. AC&S, Inc. (2015)

    …2015. ECF No. 27. Plaintiff's original complaint\[1\] named Westinghouse and General Electric ("GE"), as well as 20 additional defendants\[2\] that have all since been dismissed from the case. After the cause of action…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia · April 2, 2018 · in the opinion

    Hopeman Brothers, Inc. v. Continental Cas. Co. (2018)

    …11) (emphasis in original). Hopeman then explains that, in light of Appalachian Insurance Co. v. General Electric Co., 8 N.Y.3d 162, 831 N.Y.S.2d 742, 863 N.E.2d 994, 999 (2007)…

  3. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · December 21, 2016

    Brinkman v. General Dynamics Corporation (2016)

    …defense is available in failure-to-warn cases; this favored General Dynamics and Electric Boat over the Brinkmans. The government contractor defense is available in failure-to-warn cases, so a district court may not remand…

  4. Court case · Virginia Court of Appeals · February 15, 2011 · in the opinion

    National College OF Business and Technology, Inc. v. Davenport (2011)

    …Wiggins noticed four-inch diameter holes cut through the concrete floor. The holes were for electrical conduit to pass through the floor to the basement. He was told there was an old boiler room beneath that…

  5. Court case · Virginia Court of Appeals · April 3, 2012 · in the opinion

    National College OF Business and Technology, Inc. v. Malveaux (2012)

    …Wiggins noticed four-inch diameter holes cut through the concrete floor. The holes were for an electrical conduit to pass through the floor to the basement. He was told there was an old boiler room beneath…

  6. Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · October 11, 2018 · in the opinion

    Quisenberry v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (2018)

    …a stranger, was non-fatally electrocuted when he touched defendant's transformer, "\[r\]easonable care requires those using dangerous agencies to avail themselves of the best mechanical contrivances and inventions in practical use which are effectual…

  7. Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · September 14, 2012

    John Crane, Inc. v. Hardick (2012)

    …against John Crane, Inc., while the $1.15 million loss of society award stayed vacated. In a general maritime survival action based on a seaman's death, courts look to the Jones Act, so the decedent…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia · September 8, 2015

    Parker v. Hunting Point Apartments, LLC (2015)

    …how or to what extent he was exposed. It found no specific act or omission by the defendants beyond a general reference to negligent construction and renovation. It also found no allegation that he had been…

  9. Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · March 2, 2012

    John Crane, Inc. v. Hardick (2012)

    …whether under DOHSA, the Jones Act, or general maritime law, and a Navy sailor who contributed to the function of vessels and had a substantial connection to them is a seaman. Arguments not briefed under Rule…

  10. Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · January 10, 2013

    Kiser v. AW Chesterton Co. (2013)

    …accrued at the first diagnosis, asbestosis, not the later mesothelioma diagnosis. The court said any change must come from the General Assembly. Two justices dissented. They would have treated mesothelioma as a separate cause of action.

  11. Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · August 31, 2017 · in the opinion

    Cole v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company (2017)

    …chemicals. Id. at 692. Each employee had previously executed a general release in the course of settling unrelated FELA claims. Id. These releases "appeared to settle all claims for all injuries past and future." Id. In…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia · September 28, 2018 · in the opinion

    Goodrich v. John Crane, Inc. (2018)

    …or videotapes of insulated pipes or systems on ships and insinuating\] that the insulation \[shown\] . . . was asbestos, in general, or amosite asbestos, in particular and that Mr. Goodrich would have been exposed to friable asbestos from. …

  13. Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · January 10, 2013 · in the opinion

    Ford Motor Co. v. Boomer (2013)

    …more widely used terminology in Virginia as well as the terminology used by the circuit court in this case. \[3\] Although the General Assembly later established a discovery rule for asbestos-related diseases based on diagnosis…

  14. Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · November 1, 2012 · in the opinion

    Gibbs v. Newport News Shipbuilding and Drydock Company (2012)

    …hazard of life itself. It is difficult to imagine that the General Assembly intended to include it within the term "contract of hire," however broadly defined. For the purposes of this appeal, it is not necessary…

  15. Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · January 10, 2013 · in the opinion

    Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Minton (2013)

    …Scindia, 451 U.S. at 167. Exxon argues that there was no active involvement because its supervision did not extend beyond general oversight. Using the language of the court in Dow v. Oldendorff Carriers GMBH & Co.…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia · August 24, 2018 · in the opinion

    Goodrich v. John Crane, Inc. (2018)

    …not relevant evidence of the "state of the art." JCI argues that evidence of the Navy's knowledge is a "critical component" of the general knowledge and state of the art literature concerning asbestos health hazards…