32 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · July 7, 2015
Haas v. 3M Company (2015)
The Third Circuit vacated the District Court's summary judgment for General Electric, which Haas had appealed, and remanded for further proceedings. It also held the District Court did not abuse its discretion in admitting Brasmer…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · September 25, 2019
McClung v. 3M Company (2019)
The district court denied Plaintiff's objections, adopted the magistrate judge's recommendations as modified, found no personal jurisdiction over General Electric or Boeing, denied their motions to dismiss, and severed and transferred the claims against…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · April 17, 2017
McClung v. 3M Company (2017)
The court severed the claims against General Electric and transferred them to the Southern District of West Virginia, granting General Electric's request and denying its motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction as moot…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin · June 3, 2015
Spychalla v. Boeing Aerospace Operations Inc. (2015)
The district court denied summary judgment to Boeing, Cessna and General Electric, granted and denied the motions in limine in part, and allowed Boeing to file a late government contractor defense motion. The court did not…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · July 24, 2014
Haas v. 3M Company (2014)
…continued the case after his death. This opinion decided summary judgment motions by Boeing, General Electric and Goodyear. The court held that Boeing was protected by the government contractor defense, because the Air Force collaborated on…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · February 8, 2011 · in the opinion
Glein v. Boeing Company (2011)
…known as VIACOM, Inc., formerly known as WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP.; CERTAIN-TEED CORP.; CROWN CORK & SEAL COMPANY, INC.; DANA CORP.; CEERE & COMPANY; FORD MOTOR COMPANY; GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC; GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP.; GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY; GEORGIA…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · June 25, 2010 · in the opinion
Glein v. Boeing Company (2010)
…a Viacom, Inc. f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corp.; Certain Teed Corp.; Crown Cork & Seal Co.; Dana Corp.; Deere & Co.; Ford Motor Co.; Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC; General Dynamics Corp.; General Electric Co.; Georgia Pacific, LLC…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · May 27, 2015 · in the opinion
Schwartz v. Abex Corp. (2015)
…other points of law), Chicano v. General Electric Co., 2004 WL 2250990 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 5, 2004) (O'Neill, J.), and In re Asbestos Products Liability Litig. (Hoffeditz v. AM General, LLC), 2011 WL 5881008 …
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · May 16, 2013 · in the opinion
Scearce v. 3M Company (2013)
…alleged that "\[f\]rom approximately 1983 to 2004, Mr. Scearce was exposed to asbestos-containing products while conducting electric repair work at various Air Force base sites, including McGuire Air Force Base in New Jersey. Mr…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 18, 2017 · in the opinion
Macaluso v. A.O. Smith Corp. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…rock, floor tiles, and electrical equipment), and also while employed as a plumber's helper (from boilers and boiler insulation) during the period 1972 to 1982. Eugene Story-(deceased) Was exposed to Asbestos dust from valves…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 13, 2017 · in the opinion
Brooks v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…to asbestos in the following manner: Ronald Brooks: (Living with Lung Cancer) Exposed to Asbestos while working as a construction worker, fireman, and during service as electrician's mate in the U.S. Navy, (1974-1989)…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 26, 2016
Boyd v. Boeing Company (2016)
The court denied Lockheed Martin's and General Dynamics' motions to reconsider the order allowing plaintiffs to add them as defendants after the amendment deadline, and denied their motion to strike them from the amended complaint…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · February 18, 2016
Brown v. Lockheed Martin Corp. (2016)
…of the estate's asbestos claims against Lockheed Martin for lack of personal jurisdiction in Connecticut. A corporation is not subject to general jurisdiction merely because it has substantial but small-share contacts with a state…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 12, 2019
English v. Johnson & Johnson (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…to dismiss the plaintiffs' complaint and all cross-claims against them for lack of personal jurisdiction, ruling against plaintiffs English and Raso. New York courts lacked general jurisdiction over New Jersey-incorporated, New Jersey-headquartered defendants…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 23, 2019
Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. v. Dickson (2019)
…of risk viewed prospectively and that the employer was actually, subjectively aware of that risk to the plaintiff. General knowledge of asbestos hazards, and later studies, did not show Bell's awareness of an extreme risk…
-
Court case · Connecticut Supreme Court · April 5, 2017 · in the opinion
Bagley v. Adel Wiggins Group (2017)
\[12\] "Common knowledge is limited, however, to those well substantiated facts that are obvious to the general community." State v. Padua, 273 Conn. 138, 193, 869 A.2d 192 (2005) (Katz, J., dissenting and concurring). Common…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · September 9, 2013 · in the opinion
Williams v. Lockheed Martin Corp. (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, 2013)
…like opposing counsel talking to employees of his clients and that he holds himself to the same standard. He chooses as a general rule not to speak to employees of opposing counsel's clients. July 15…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida · March 29, 2016 · in the opinion
Dugas v. 3M Company (2016)
…basic training, Mr. Dugas was assigned to be an aviation structural mechanic or metal-smith ("AMS"). Id. His job duties were general aircraft maintenance, which included documenting and repairing defects. Id. at 20-21. The Navy…
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · September 18, 2014 · in the opinion
Walston v. Boeing Company (2014)
…gross negligence, yet short of premeditated and deliberate harm). Our holding in Birklid interprets the intentional tort consistently with general tort principles while still keeping in mind the IIA's purpose of balancing competing interests. 127…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · June 28, 2019 · in the opinion
Blakely v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (2019)
…Rubber & Supply Co., 117 Ohio App. 12 (7th Dist.1961). {¶31} "\[W\]hen the Ohio General Assembly enacted the current version of the \[Ohio Products Liability Act, R.C. 2307.71 et seq.\], it abrogated all…