No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

23 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 3, 2013

    Ambruso v. Goulds Pumps (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2013)

    …D. Roosevelt electrical engineer 1950s-1980s; shipfitter and seaman in the United States Navy Brooklyn Navy Yard Brooklyn 1940s; shipfitter and seaman in the United States Navy USS Chicago 1940s; insulator 1950s-1990s; general laborer, bus…

  2. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · July 22, 2015

    Baumgartner v. American Standard, Inc. (2015)

    Dennis Baumgartner, an Ohio man diagnosed with mesothelioma in 2013, and his wife Gail sued many makers of valves, boilers and turbines in Rhode Island. He had worked as an insulator and insulator helper at jobsites in Ohio and, occasionally,…

  3. Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 26, 2013

    Baiocco v. AC & S., Inc. (2013)

    …s Mate and fire control mechanic United States Navy and shipyards 1950s-1980s; signalman Boston & Maine Railroad 1950s-1980s; Pipe Coverer United States Navy 1950s-1980s; winder General Electric Schenectady 1950s-1980s; bricklayer factories, churches, schools…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · July 31, 2012 · in the opinion

    Thurmon v. Scapa Waycross (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, 2012)

    …Plaintiffs named forty entities as defendants including Scapa Waycross, Warren Pumps and Honeywell International. Defendant General Electric removed the action to federal court on April 29, 2011. It was then transferred to MDL 875 on May…

  5. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · March 24, 2011 · in the opinion

    State EX rel. Roger Bacon High School v. Indus. Comm. OF Ohio (2011)

    …Technologies, LLC, RPM, Inc., RPM International, Inc., Bondex International, Inc., C.P. Hall, Alliedsignal, 3M Company, CBS Corp., General Electric, Georgia-Pacific, Peerless, Fidelity Builders, Supply, Inc., R. E. Kramig & Co., Inc., A. W. Chesterton, McGraw…

  6. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · March 23, 2011 · in the opinion

    Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. v. Saville (2011)

    …money must be used to pay claims, that general liability under the Joint Tort-feasors Act is established by the fact of the creation of the Trust and payment of settlement. We disagree. Under the Act…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 8, 2018 · in the opinion

    Foglia v. Moore Dry Dock Company (2018)

    …secondary exposure, MDD challenged the evidence that Father worked for MDD at the shipyard as an electrician on ship conversion that had been introduced through decedent's deposition and Garcia's declaration as inadmissible hearsay, as…

  8. Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 18, 2017 · in the opinion

    Macaluso v. A.O. Smith Corp. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …rock, floor tiles, and electrical equipment), and also while employed as a plumber's helper (from boilers and boiler insulation) during the period 1972 to 1982. Eugene Story-(deceased) Was exposed to Asbestos dust from valves…

  9. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 18, 2019 · in the opinion

    ALBIN v. AJAX MAGNETHERMIC CORPORATION (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …Mass toxic tort cases, including asbestos cases, may be consolidated if they meet the requirements of the general rule governing consolidation of cases (In re Asbestos Litigation, 173 F.R.D.81, 38 Fed.R.Serv…

  10. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 17, 2019 · in the opinion

    Knudsen v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …Mass toxic tort cases, including asbestos cases, may be consolidated if they meet the requirements of the general rule governing consolidation of cases (In re Asbestos Litigation, 173 F.R.D.81, 38 Fed.R.Serv…

  11. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 23, 2019

    Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. v. Dickson (2019)

    …of risk viewed prospectively and that the employer was actually, subjectively aware of that risk to the plaintiff. General knowledge of asbestos hazards, and later studies, did not show Bell's awareness of an extreme risk…

  12. Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · April 10, 2013

    Greer v. Ace Hardware Corporation (2013)

    …summary judgment, the plaintiff must produce evidence identifying a specific asbestos-containing product the defendant made or supplied and to which the plaintiff was exposed; general assertions that "some" products contained asbestos, or guesswork, are not…

  13. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · January 15, 2014 · in the opinion

    Estate of Barabin v. AstenJohnson, Inc. (2014)

    …review and publication; 3) the known or potential error rate of the theory or technique; and 4) whether the theory or technique enjoys general acceptance within the relevant scientific community." United States v. Hankey, 203 F…

  14. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · November 16, 2012 · in the opinion

    Barabin v. AstenJohnson, Inc. (2012)

    …recognize an impeachment exception to the collateral source rule, but relied only on the "well-established" general rule. Because there appear to be good grounds to recognize an impeachment exception to the Washington collateral source rule…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · August 30, 2013 · in the opinion

    Morgan v. Bill Vann Company, Inc. (2013)

    …other defendants after May 19, 1979. But applicable law imposes on plaintiff the burden of proving exposure to each particular defendant's products, not just proving exposure to asbestos in general. See, e.g., Hoffman v…

  16. Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 9, 2019 · in the opinion

    Jackson v. CertainTeed Corp. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …he used them. (id. at 524:22-527:25). He stated a general belief that the shingles contained asbestos because, essentially, all such products in the industry did at that time (see id. at 533:6…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · July 3, 2013 · in the opinion

    Lund v. 3M Company (2013)

    …Inc., 223 F.3d 1082, 1086 (9th Cir. 2000)). Factors taken into account when analyzing general jurisdiction include whether the defendant "makes sales, solicits, or engages in business in the state, serves the state's markets…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · February 12, 2018 · in the opinion

    Barabin v. Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. (2018)

    …review and publication; (3) the known or potential error rate of the theory or technique; and (4) whether the theory or technique enjoys general acceptance within the relevant scientific community. See Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 7, 2016 · in the opinion

    Murphy v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. (2016)

    …with a motion and proposed order to have the exceptions set for hearing, in state court. In general, "\[a\] waiver of the right to remove must be clear and unequivocal." Furthermore, as explained in Bourdier v…

  20. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 16, 2015 · in the opinion

    Leidig v. Zenith Electronics LLC (2015)

    …the testimony of Bob Darby, an engineer who had met decedent at General Motors Defense Research Lab (GM) in the 1960's and who claimed to have seen decedent work on radios and televisions, including Zeniths…