15 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · March 1, 2013 · in the opinion
Burkhart v. HJ Heinz Co. (2013)
…No. 7 with her memorandum in opposition to summary judgment contains certain pages from a "Supplemental Response to Plaintiffs' Master Discovery Requests" by Owens Corning Fiberglas Corporation in a Summit County Common Pleas Court case, In…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · September 5, 2013 · in the opinion
Coffman v. Dept. OF Rehab. & Corr. (2013)
…176 Ohio App.3d 459, 2008-Ohio-2426 (10th Dist.) citing Lavelle v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 30 Ohio Misc.2d 11, 14 (1987) (An increased fear of cancer may be compensable if an asbestosis afflicted…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · September 5, 2013 · in the opinion
Perry v. Dept. OF Rehab. & Corr. (2013)
…176 Ohio App.3d 459, 2008-Ohio-2426 (10th Dist.) citing Lavelle v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 30 Ohio Misc.2d 11, 14 (1987) (An increased fear of cancer may be compensable if an asbestosis afflicted…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · November 10, 2016 · in the opinion
French v. AW Chesterton Company (2016)
…conduct performed under color of federal office; and (4) defendant raises a colorable federal defense to plaintiff's claim. Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124, 127 (3rd Cir. 1998) (citing Mesa v…
-
Court case · Ohio Supreme Court · September 3, 2014 · in the opinion
Burkhart v. HJ Heinz Co. (2014)
…insulation sent to the facility in Bowling Green, interrogatories filed in unrelated litigation in which Owens Corning Fiberglass Corporation admitted that this type of pipe insulation [\432] contained asbestos, an environmental report indicating that asbestos was…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 5, 2016 · in the opinion
Watkins v. Affinia Group (2016)
…from 1957 to 1958, where he was exposed to rolls of asbestos insulation and asbestos pipe covering. Owens Corning Fiberglass sold the insulation to the Babcock facility while Glenn worked there. The insulation, known as "Kaylo…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · January 27, 2011 · in the opinion
Fisher v. Alliance Machine Co. (2011)
…employed there. Accordingly, we disagree that it qualifies as a written admission. {¶ 42} Fisher's estate also attached several invoices from Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, purporting to show that Clark distributed asbestos products, specifically, Kaylo pipe…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 5, 2016 · in the opinion
Estate OF Blandford v. AO Smith Corp. (2016)
…to Harry Rennecker's deposition testimony and interrogatory answers. Rennecker's family owned Hart during the relevant time period and is still owns 51 percent of it. Rennecker began working at Hart as a teenager in…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · November 27, 2013 · in the opinion
Fisher v. Beazer East, Inc. (2013)
…and other workers inhaled. As to other products, Antal admitted on cross-examination that Owens-Corning Kaylo was also used as pipe insulation near Bohazi and other boilermakers. {¶ 7} Les Allshouse ("Allshouse") testified that he worked…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · March 24, 2011 · in the opinion
State EX rel. Roger Bacon High School v. Indus. Comm. OF Ohio (2011)
…writ of mandamus. \[1\] Beazer East, Allen Refractories, Osborne Industries, A.C. Product Liability Trust, Certainteed, Dana and Union Carbide, Owens-Illinois, Riley Stoker Corp., Daimler Chrysler Corp., Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC, RPM, Inc., RPM International…
-
Court case · Ohio Supreme Court · April 3, 2012 · in the opinion
Bowens v. Sager Corp. (In re All Cases Against Sager Corp., 2012)
…244, 577 P.2d 293 (1978) ("We hold that the question of whether a foreign corporation can be sued after dissolution depends upon the law of the state of incorporation"); Owens v. Allied Underwriters, 207 La…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · December 9, 2019 · in the opinion
Shaffer v. AW Chesterton Co. (2019)
…equity is to supplement the law where it is insufficient, moderating the unjust results that would follow from the unbending application of the law." Discover Bank v. Owens, 129 Ohio Misc.2d 71, 2004-Ohio-7333…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · November 30, 2015 · in the opinion
Bryant v. General Motors Corp. (2015)
…mask when he was working. Bell: I can't say so. (Id. at 53-54). Regarding the asbestos wrapped ovens, Bell explained that "\[o\]ver a period of years they did away with them. Over probably…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · October 19, 2017 · in the opinion
French v. AW Chesterton Company (2017)
…he identified one of Green Tweed's products as being a potential cause of his exposure. He testified that rope on the leveler doors of the coke ovens at U.S. Steel was manufactured by Palmetto…
-
Court case · Ohio Supreme Court · January 24, 2018 · in the opinion
Schwartz v. Honeywell Internatl., Inc. (2018)
…R.C. 2307.96(B), the statute provides no definition for the term "substantial factor." This lack of clarity opens the door to inconsistent application of R.C. 2307.96 and gave rise to this appeal. {¶…