No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

47 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 1 of 3

  1. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · July 21, 2010 · in the opinion

    Summers v. Certainteed Corp. (2010)

    Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 840 A.2d 1028 (Pa.Super.2004) (outlining the competing standards for establishment of a prima facie case).\[10\] The OISR then opined that Appellants, through Dr. Gelfand's reports and conclusions…

  2. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · May 22, 2019 · in the opinion

    Lamson v. Georgia-Pacific LLC (2019)

    …more than the presence of asbestos in the workplace; he must prove that he worked in the vicinity of the product's use. Coward v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 729 A.2d 614, 622 (Pa. Super…

  3. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · August 5, 2014 · in the opinion

    Nelson v. Airco Welders Supply (2014)

    …Inc., 799 A.2d 71, 86 (Pa.Super.2002) (quoting Coward v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 729 A.2d 614, 622-23 (Pa.Super.1999)) ("In asbestos litigation, evidence is sufficient to establish product identity where…

  4. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 5, 2013 · in the opinion

    Nelson v. Airco Welders Supply (2013)

    …a jury, the exposure at issue was not de minimis. See Smalls v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 843 A.2d 410 (Pa. Super. 2004); Cauthorn v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 840 A.2d 1028 (Pa. Super. 2004…

  5. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 30, 2010 · in the opinion

    Betz v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2010)

    …is \[a\] significant and substantial contributing factor to the \[plaintiff's\] asbestos related disease." Smalls v. Pittsburgh-Corning, 843 A.2d 410, 414 (Pa.Super.2004); Cauthorn v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 840 A.2d 1028…

  6. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · February 21, 2012 · in the opinion

    Daley v. AW Chesterton, Inc. (2012)

    …Instead, Appellees offer the Superior Court's decision in McCauley v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 715 A.2d 1125 (Pa.Super.1998), as support for interpreting Marinari as allowing separate causes of action for separate and…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 1, 2012 · in the opinion

    Vedros v. Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding, Inc. (2012)

    …asserted the government contractor defense as a colorable defense. Hagen, 739 F. Supp. 2d at 776 (citing Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglass Corp., 153 F.3d 124, 127 (3d Cir. 1998)); see also Jefferson Cnty. v…

  8. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · May 23, 2012 · in the opinion

    Betz v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2012)

    …etal., have included a compendium of cases which includes additional intermediate and trial court decisions from other jurisdictions. \[26\] See also Cauthorn v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 840 A.2d 1028, 1038-39 (Pa.Super.2004…

  9. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · March 19, 2015 · in the opinion

    Wygant v. General Electric Company (2015)

    …an attempt to remove some of the uncertainty surrounding when an affected person had sufficient knowledge to start the running of the statute of limitations. See Trieschock v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Co., 354 Pa.Super. 263…

  10. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · December 28, 2017 · in the opinion

    Roverano v. John Crane, Inc. (2017)

    …identify "a reasonable basis for determining the contribution of each cause to a single harm." Restatement (Second) of Torts § 433A(1) (1965); see Martin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 515 Pa. 377, 528 A.2d 947…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · September 24, 2010 · in the opinion

    Hagen v. Benjamin Foster Co. (2010)

    …a colorable federal defense; and (4) there is a causal nexus between the claims and the conduct performed under color of a federal office. Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124, 127 (3d…

  12. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · November 22, 2016 · in the opinion

    Rost v. Ford Motor Co. (2016)

    …Ltd., 153 Or.App. 415, 959 P.2d 89, 94 (1998); Sheffield v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 595 So.2d 443, 456 (Ala. 1992), the majority of state and federal courts have adopted the "frequency, regularity…

  13. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · June 3, 2011 · in the opinion

    Rabatin v. Allied Glove Corp. (2011)

    …Brief at 14. Rabatin does not direct us to any Pennsylvania authority in support of this argument, but does cite to one case from a Florida appellate court, Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp. v. Corcoran, 679 So…

  14. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · May 24, 2013 · in the opinion

    In re Pittsburgh Corning Corporation (2013)

    …Pittsburgh Corning allegedly had responsibility. See Garlock Exhibits 121, 132 165, 167, 178, 174, and 203. For example, the discovery response marked as Exhibit 203 identifies ten bankrupt entities, including Armstrong, Babcock & Wilcox, Fibreboard, Owens Corning…

  15. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · May 16, 2013 · in the opinion

    In re Pittsburgh Corning Corporation (2013)

    …Pittsburgh Corning allegedly had responsibility. See Garlock Exhibits 121, 132 165, 167, 178, 174, and 203. For example, the discovery response marked as Exhibit 203 identifies 10 bankrupt entities, including Armstrong, Babcock & Wilcox, Fibreboard, Owens Corning…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · December 23, 2010 · in the opinion

    Cowley v. Acands, Inc. (2010)

    …consider it. \[5\] In oral argument, Plaintiff asserted that Pittsburgh Corning and Owens-Corning had the same motives as MCIC since these companies had a distributorship agreement with MCIC. (Transcript of Oral Argument at 7-8…

  17. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · May 29, 2012 · in the opinion

    Fisher v. Sexauer (2012)

    …Armstrong World Industries, Inc. 799 A.2d 71, 86 (Pa.Super.2002) (quoting Coward v. Owens-Corning, 729 A.2d 614, 622-23 (Pa.Super.1999)). Nevertheless, Eckenrod's threshold standard does not establish an immutable…

  18. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · January 26, 2017 · in the opinion

    Wagner v. Standard Steel, Lcc (2017)

    …the subsequent cases interpreting it, In re: Grossman's Inc., 607 F.3d 114 (3d Cir. 2010) (en banc), and Wright v. Owens Corning, 679 F.3d 101 (3d Cir. 2012), cert. denied, 133 S.Ct…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · September 30, 2014 · in the opinion

    Mt. McKinley Ins. Co. v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp. (2014)

    …951 (1995). Should either PPG or Corning breach a contractual duty it owes under the policies, Mt. McKinley may assert that as a defense in coverage litigation. Neither PPG nor Corning may claim that § 6.5…

  20. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · June 16, 2011 · in the opinion

    In re Pittsburgh Corning Corporation (2011)

    …times, (4) PPG and PCC have joint insurance coverage, (5) PPG permitted PCC to participate in its insurance coverage program, and (6) provided certain services to PCC." In re Pittsburgh Corning, 417 B.R. at 296…