7 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · December 29, 2014 · in the opinion
Sparkman v. AW Chesterton Company (2014)
…plaintiffs have raised a genuine dispute as to whether Sparkman was exposed to asbestos from his work with and around a Research-Cottrell precipitator on a frequent and regular basis. See Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · December 29, 2014 · in the opinion
Sparkman v. AW Chesterton Company (2014)
…C. 2007). The South Carolina Supreme Court has adopted the "frequency, regularity and proximity test" set forth by the Fourth Circuit in Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156 (4th Cir. 1986). Henderson, 644…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · December 29, 2014 · in the opinion
Sparkman v. AW Chesterton Company (2014)
…C. 2007). The South Carolina Supreme Court has adopted the "frequency, regularity and proximity test" set forth by the Fourth Circuit in Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156 (4th Cir. 1986). Henderson, 644…
-
Court case · South Carolina Court of Appeals · February 13, 2019 · in the opinion
Keene v. Cna Holdings, LLC (2019)
…698 S.E.2d 835, 838 (Ct. App. 2010) ("Unfair prejudice means an undue tendency to suggest a decision on an improper basis." (quoting State v. Owens, 346 S.C. 637, 666, 552 S.E.2d…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · February 13, 2017 · in the opinion
Chesher v. 3M Company (2017)
…above, the Conner court relied heavily on the Lindstrom decision in concluding that a manufacturer owes no duty to warn with respect to "asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute." See Conner, 842…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · January 27, 2016 · in the opinion
Dandridge v. Crane Co. (2016)
…rule under maritime law that "a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute." Conner…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · April 16, 2018 · in the opinion
Bostic v. 3M Company (2018)
…statute has "consistently been held to require complete diversity of citizenship. That is, diversity jurisdiction does not exist unless each defendant is a citizen of a different State from each plaintiff." Owen Equip. & Erection Co. v…