442 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 1 of 23
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · November 26, 2012
Brannan v. Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust (2012)
The personal representatives of four deceased men (Brannan, McFadden, Nardone and Jakubowski) had each won asbestos verdicts in Baltimore City between 1996 and 2001. All four died of mesothelioma. Three had been steelworkers at Bethlehem Steel…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · September 18, 2013 · in the opinion
Gillenwater v. Honeywell Intern., Inc. (2013)
…Owens-Corning's Distribution of Kaylo Manufactured By Owens-Illinois, Followed By Owens-Corning's Purchase of the Kaylo Division ¶ 53 In 1943, Owens-Illinois began operating the pilot plant to manufacture Kaylo. $2,849,000…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 3, 2010
Collins v. Plant Insulation Company (2010)
…the FTCA's discretionary function exception is an immunity from suit, not a determination that the government owes no duty or is not at fault, so fault may be apportioned to the Navy under Proposition 51…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · May 13, 2019
Cameron v. Atlantic Richfield Company (2019)
Gary Cameron died in 2012 of mesothelioma caused by asbestos exposure. His wife, Linda Cameron, sued several companies, including PacifiCorp, which with other utilities sponsored construction of the Centralia Steam Plant in the 1970s. Asbestos was…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 29, 2014
Brown v. Bell & Gossett Co. (2014)
Harry Brown sued Consolidated Edison and others, claiming asbestos exposure caused his mesothelioma. He died in September 2013, and his wife Phyllis pursued the case as administratrix of his estate and in her own right. It was undisputed that in…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · September 30, 2016 · in the opinion
Suoja v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (2016)
…F. Owens-Illinois Kaylo was hard, cementitious, and insoluble in water. Owens-Illinois stopped manufacturing and selling Kaylo on April 30, 1958, when it sold the Kaylo Division to a separate company, Owens Corning Fiberglas. Between…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 2, 2012
Nolen v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (2012)
…water treatment chemicals Pacific State Steel Fremont or Hayward 1976-1979; sales engineer/sales representative for water treatment chemicals Owens-Corning Fiberglass Santa Clara 1976-1979; sales engineer/sales representative for water treatment chemicals Chevron Richmond…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · December 3, 2015
Feaster v. AW Chesterton Company (2015)
The court granted summary judgment to Owens-Illinois, Brand Insulations and Durametallic, and against plaintiff Feaster, because he did not identify any of them as a source of his asbestos exposure. Under New Jersey law, an…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin · August 29, 2014 · in the opinion
Ahnert v. Brand Insulation Inc. (2014)
…on the merits by a court with jurisdiction;" and (3) an "identity of the causes of action in the two suits." Sopha v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 230 Wis.2d 212, 601 N.W.2d 627…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · February 2, 2016 · in the opinion
Weis v. Dsm Copolymer, Inc. (2016)
…is improper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1442(a)(2). See Faulk v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 48 F.Supp.2d 653, 670 (E.D.Tex.1999). Accordingly, the court will focus its analysis of…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 6, 2015 · in the opinion
Galasso v. BF Goodrich (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2015)
1995\]). In addition, issues of credibility are for the jury (Cochrane v Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 219 AD2d 557, 559-60). Where "\[t\]he deposition testimony of a litigant is sufficient to raise an issue of…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · July 8, 2013 · in the opinion
Georgia Pacific v. Farrar (2013)
…should have been aware, of the danger to household members at the time. See Rohrbaugh v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, 965 F.2d 844 (10th Cir.1992) (applying Oklahoma law); Martin v. Cincinnati Gas and Electric…
-
Court case · Alabama Supreme Court · September 30, 2015 · in the opinion
Kruse v. Vanderbilt Minerals, LLC (2015)
…one element of causation,'... the \threshold requirement of any products liability action is identification of the injury-causing product and its manufacturer.'" Sheffield v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 595 So.2d 443, 450 (Ala.1992) (citations…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · May 22, 2019 · in the opinion
Lamson v. Georgia-Pacific LLC (2019)
…more than the presence of asbestos in the workplace; he must prove that he worked in the vicinity of the product's use. Coward v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 729 A.2d 614, 622 (Pa. Super…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · March 8, 2017 · in the opinion
Charlevoix v. Caterpillar, Inc. (2017)
821 Moreover, the plaintiff must show "the manufacturer's asbestos product was used at the specific site within the workplace where \[the plaintiff\] worked." Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 726 F.Supp. 172, 174 (W…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · August 10, 2018 · in the opinion
Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust v. Busch (2018)
…is what the Court of Appeals has "termed a \bystander,' in that he did not work directly with the asbestos products but was in the vicinity of where such products were used." Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 22, 2010 · in the opinion
Whitmire v. Ingersoll-Rand Company (2010)
Such evidence is simply not "of sufficient weight to support a reasonable inference of causation." (Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650, 656; see also McGonnell v. Kaiser Gypsum Co., supra…
-
Court case · Arkansas Supreme Court · December 15, 2016 · in the opinion
Hendrix v. Alcoa, Inc. (2016)
… Ganske v. Spahn & Rose Lumber Co., 580 N.W.2d 812 (Iowa 1998); Tomlinson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 244 Kan. 506, 770 P.2d 833 (1989). Only the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's decision in Tooey…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · August 9, 2019 · in the opinion
Schneider Electric USA, Inc. v. Williams (2019)
…also was once that same entity's employee. We instead conclude, upon presentation of proper evidence,\[13\] the apportionment procedures in Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. should be followed, the only difference being Square D would be…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · September 19, 2014 · in the opinion
Luna v. AW Chesterton Company (2014)
…at 334. Evidence of the mere physical presence of asbestos-containing material is insufficient to find a manufacturer liable to a plaintiff. Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 2003-0248 (La.App. 1st Cir. 4/2…