17 results for “Owens-Illinois”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · December 6, 2016
Ney v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (2016)
…at Bethlehem Steel from 1948 to 1953. A co-worker named only Owens-Illinois's Kaylo pipe covering and Quigley's Insulag spray as asbestos products at that site. Plaintiff sought documents and a corporate witness…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 21, 2018 · in the opinion
Trapp v. CertainTEED Corporation (2018)
…In so doing, appellants are not "expected to prove the scientifically unknown details of carcinogenesis, or trace the unknowable path of a given asbestos fiber." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 976.…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 18, 2013 · in the opinion
Strickland v. Union Carbide Corp. (2013)
…Zogarts (1975) 14 Cal.3d 104, 110.) Law Governing Proof of Causation in Asbestos Cases Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford) sets forth the controlling standard for proving causation in an…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · June 22, 2017 · in the opinion
Rockman v. Union Carbide Corp. (2017)
…of punitive damages. This Court has previously granted Georgia-Pacific summary judgment on the issue of punitive damages in a similar asbestos action, Covington v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co., No. GLR-12-461, 2014 WL 12661857…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · July 17, 2017 · in the opinion
Rockman v. Union Carbide Corp. (2017)
…No. 162-35. The United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin has recently rejected Dr. Frank's rephrasing in Suoja v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 211 F.Supp.3d 1196, 1207 (W.D. Wis…
-
Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · October 24, 2012 · in the opinion
Rich v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. (2012)
…to refutation on cross-examination). This does not render the prejudicial portion of Kirk's deposition dealing with Kaiser Gypsum's products admissible. See Murphy v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 779 F.2d 340, 344 (6th Cir…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 16, 2010 · in the opinion
Stewart v. Union Carbide Corporation (2010)
…defective designs of the other companies' products were legal causes of the plaintiffs' injuries; and the percentage of legal cause attributable to the other companies." (Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · September 16, 2014 · in the opinion
Sherin v. John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. (2014)
…evidence of exposure to the defendant's asbestos. See Reiter v. Pneumo Abex, LLC, 8 A.3d 725, 729 (Md. 2010); Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Zenobia, 602 A.2d 1182, 1184 (Md. 1992). \[33\] This evidence…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · December 5, 2012 · in the opinion
Martinez v. EI DuPont De Nemours and Co. (2012)
…chemical agent manufactured by DuPont. Plaintiff also cites the Superior Court decision in Lluerma v. Owens Illinois\[90\] as support for her opposition to the Motion to Dismiss on forum non conveniens grounds. In that case…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 23, 2010 · in the opinion
Wilson v. Certainteed Corporation (2010)
…653.) He could not identify Owens-Corning's "Kaylo" insulation as one of the asbestos products to which he was exposed and relied on the testimony of one witness in an earlier case who had worked…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 28, 2010 · in the opinion
Johnson v. Certainteed Corporation (2010)
…trigger strict liability for that product's defect. As already stressed, liability for product defects "is not absolute." (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., supra, 53 Cal.3d at p. 994.) The imposition of liability must…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 22, 2016 · in the opinion
Bartolone v. Union Carbide Corp. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2016)
…Grace & Co.-Conn), 216 AD2d 79 \[1st Dept. 1995\]). Issues of credibility are for the jury (Cochrane v Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 219 AD2d 557, 559-60). Where "\[t\]he deposition testimony of a litigant is…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 21, 2016 · in the opinion
Baeza v. Special Electric Company, Inc. (2016)
…employer had no liability for plaintiff's injuries beyond payment of workers' compensation benefits\]; Arena v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1178, 1198 \[applied Proposition 51 to strict liability asbestos case\].) Defendant…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin · October 9, 2015 · in the opinion
Herr v. Linde LLC (2015)
…he inhaled asbestos dust; rather, he must produce evidence tending to show that he inhaled asbestos produced by the defendant's product." Harris v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 102 F.3d 1429, 1432 (7th Cir. 1996) …
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · October 4, 2011
Robertson v. Doug Ashy Building Materials, Inc. (2011)
…at issue, and circumstantial evidence that a manufacturer bought the supplier's asbestos can create a fact question on exposure. A raw-asbestos supplier also owes the general duty of reasonable care. Causation; Product Identification; Expert…
-
Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · March 20, 2012
Union Carbide Corporation v. Fields (2012)
…the plaintiff's injury; inference, unverified allegations, or settled status alone are not enough. An employer owes no duty for take-home exposure, so it bears no allocable fault. Causation; Product Identification; Expert Testimony; Take-Home…
-
Court case · Mississippi Supreme Court · June 5, 2014 · in the opinion
Union Carbide Corporation v. Nix (2014)
…industry, and warnings and safety. Ziegler is a petroleum engineer who owns a safety and petroleum consulting firm and a small oil company. He had worked in the drilling industry since he was fifteen years old…