7 results for “Reaction Department”
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 10, 2013 · in the opinion
Vega v. Georgia-Pacific, LLC (2013)
…s exhibit 20 is a 1966 study commissioned by UCC which revealed that rats had a more "severe reaction" to Calidria asbestos that had been mined by UCC in California than asbestos that had been mined…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 10, 2014 · in the opinion
Carmody v. DAP (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2014)
…J.)\[5\]. The POC Order also directed the redaction of any non-party affiant's personal information prior to any such production, but acknowledged the defendants' right to "avail themselves of the discovery provisions of the…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 22, 2012 · in the opinion
Feinberg v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. (2012)
…term use. Plaintiffs suffered severe neurological reactions from taking the generic form of the drug and brought state tort claims against the manufacturers of metoclopramide for failing to adequately warn them of such danger. The basis…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 22, 2013 · in the opinion
Macek v. CBS Corporation (2013)
…Plaintiffs' exhibit 20 is a 1966 study commissioned by UCC revealing that rats had a more "severe reaction" to Calidria asbestos mined by UCC in California as compared to asbestos mined in Canada by Johns Manville…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 18, 2015 · in the opinion
Voelker v. John Crane (Matter of Eighth Jud. Dist. Asbestos Litig., 2015)
…pounds. Mr. Voelker had a bad reaction to the second round of chemotherapy and after his return home, he "spiked" a fever which required a hospital stay of ten days as the doctors tried various antibiotics…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · March 20, 2018 · in the opinion
US v. Silver (2018)
…While the argument is premature, the Court's initial reaction is that Silver is slicing the allegations against him too thinly. \[8\] The Government asserts that it has continued to investigate the case and has not…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York · September 8, 2010 · in the opinion
In re Quigley Company, Inc. (2010)
…evidence. Many contained the type of personal identifying information about the claimants that would be subject to redaction under Federal Bankruptcy Rule 9037 if filed with the Court. The Court directed the redaction of that information…