No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

10 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · October 22, 2021

    Lindsey v. Dow Chemical Company (2021)

    Kris Lindsey, a Florida citizen diagnosed with mesothelioma in September 2020, sued twelve companies in a St. Louis state court. His amended petition alleged he was exposed to asbestos from Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder, used on him as an infant and…

  2. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit · July 16, 2020

    Corley v. Long-Lewis, Inc. (2020)

    Charles Corley and his wife Myra sued dozens of companies that allegedly supplied asbestos-containing products that caused his malignant mesothelioma. The opinion says he used the products in the Navy and later as a self-employed mechanic and…

  3. Court case · Iowa Court of Appeals · August 31, 2022 · in the opinion

    Fankhauser v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2022)

    …K/A NAPA; BORGWARNER MORSE TEC LLC; WESTROCK MWV LLC; MIDWEST WHEEL COMPANIES, INC.; NAVISTAR, INC.; MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL CORPORATION; O'HALLORAN INTERNATIONAL, INC.; LESEY HAYES COMPANY; FORD MOTOR COMPANY; UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION; DEERE & COMPANY; WESTROCK…

  4. Court case · Iowa Court of Appeals · September 21, 2022 · in the opinion

    Fankhauser v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2022)

    …K/A NAPA; BORGWARNER MORSE TEC LLC; WESTROCK MWV LLC; MIDWEST WHEEL COMPANIES, INC.; NAVISTAR, INC.; MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL CORPORATION; O'HALLORAN INTERNATIONAL, INC.; LESEY HAYES COMPANY; FORD MOTOR COMPANY; UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION; DEERE & COMPANY; WESTROCK…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 1, 2023

    Haeck v. 3M Company (2023)

    …removal. The court agreed. Under Ninth Circuit precedent (Self v. General Motors), a case becomes removable only through a voluntary act by the plaintiff. Because the summary judgment for Allied Fluid was involuntary from Plaintiffs' perspective…

  6. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · October 31, 2022

    In re All Matters Related TO North American Refractories Company (2022)

    …or the common law. The court found nothing improper in parties redacting exhibits they chose to introduce. It added that, even if access applied, it would have been limited to claimant names and general medical condition.

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 1, 2022 · in the opinion

    Labarre v. Bienville Auto Parts Inc. (2022)

    …1980s and 1990s) raising the question of Bienville's general knowledge about the dangers of asbestos-containing products.\[63\] Because there is at least some evidence that Bienville knew or should have known that the products…

  8. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · December 8, 2022 · in the opinion

    In re All Matters Related TO North American Refractories Company (2022)

    …therefore, the Trust would have the burden of showing why this general principle should be set aside in this particular instance. The Trust has not cited to any authority in support of its position and the…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 13, 2021 · in the opinion

    Vanni v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2021)

    …Dr. Horn could not give the likelihood of someone in the general population just developing pericardial mesothelioma without exposure to asbestos. He estimates it would be some fraction of the eight. After listening to the testimony…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 8, 2020 · in the opinion

    Hernandez v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc. (2020)

    …2002). The Court must consider if "the plaintiff has any law (statutory, jurisprudential, or arising from the general principles of fault) to support that the defendant owed him a duty." Lemann v. Essen Lane Daiquiris, Inc.…