No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

6 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · March 23, 2021 · in the opinion

    McDaniel v. John Crane, Inc. (2021)

    …with the frequency, regularity, and proximity required by Lohrmann. First, Plaintiffs analogize the evidence in this matter to that in Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., (Pls.' Resp. (Doc. 146) at 22-23), a Fourth Circuit…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · March 9, 2023 · in the opinion

    Deem v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2023)

    …with maritime law, is that the plaintiff show "more than a casual or minimum contact with the product" to hold the defendant liable. Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. & Amchem Prod., 69 F.3d 712, 716 …

  3. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · February 19, 2020 · in the opinion

    Roverano v. John Crane, Inc. (2020)

    …case law involving strict liability and asbestos actions. See id. at 23-26 (relying on, inter alia, Martin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas, 515 Pa. 377, 528 A.2d 947, 949 (Pa. 1985) (the trial court must…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · April 8, 2022 · in the opinion

    Sentilles v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc. (2022)

    …When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · March 22, 2021 · in the opinion

    McDaniel v. John Crane, Inc. (2021)

    …Nov. 7, 2014). See, e.g., Haislip v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., No. 95-1687, 1996 WL 273686, at [\2] (4th Cir. May 23, 1996) (applying Lohrmann to North Carolina case involving a plaintiff with mesothelioma…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · September 13, 2022 · in the opinion

    Webb v. 3M Company (2022)

    …That statement does not require the removing party to provide evidence. Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co., LLC v. Owens, 574 U.S. 81, 84 (2014) (reversing the Tenth Circuit for abuse of discretion in denying review…