No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

251 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 3 of 13

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · January 7, 2022 · in the opinion

    Data v. Joy Global Underground Mining (2022)

    …of such a nature as to raise a reasonable inference that \[s\]he inhaled asbestos fibers that emanated from it.'" Wilson, 807 A.2d at 923 (quoting Coward v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 1999 Pa. Super…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 13, 2023 · in the opinion

    King v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (2023)

    …When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 14, 2022 · in the opinion

    Roussell v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc. (2022)

    …When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 17, 2023 · in the opinion

    Crossland v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc. (2023)

    …When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · May 27, 2022 · in the opinion

    Hilster v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2022)

    …Aurora Pump Co., 2004 WL 2222935, at [\1] (Conn. Super. Sept. 14, 2004) (quoting Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 726 F. Supp. 172, 174 (W.D. Mich. 1989)). "The plaintiff must produce evidence sufficient to…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 19, 2020 · in the opinion

    Mata v. Liberty Utilities (park Water) Corp. (2020)

    …2019) 37 Cal.App.5th 292, 332.) III. Section 3294 Punitive damages serve the dual public purposes of punishment and deterrence. (Stevens v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996) 49 Cal.App.4th 1645, 1658; see § 3294…

  7. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · February 18, 2020 · in the opinion

    Chevron Oronite Company, LLC v. Jacobs Field Services North America, Incorporated (2020)

    …for Bourgeois's spouse and three adult children, as well as survival damages. To arrive at that figure, Jacobs relied principally on Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 878 So. 2d 631 (La. App. 1st Cir.)…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · May 18, 2020 · in the opinion

    Whitehead v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2020)

    …that product liable." See Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712, 716 & n.2 (4th Cir. 1995) (applying the threshold causation standard outlined in Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · April 24, 2023 · in the opinion

    Hutchins v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2023)

    …When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…

  10. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · January 27, 2021 · in the opinion

    Smith v. Schlage Lock Company, LLC (2021)

    …1985) ("We agree ... that at trial plaintiff's evidence must demonstrate that he was actually exposed to the alleged offending products."); see also Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. & Amchem Prods., Inc., 69 F.3d 712…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · August 26, 2022 · in the opinion

    Becnel v. Lamorak Insurance Co. (2022)

    …1986); see also Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 2004-1589 (La. App. 1 Cir. 9/23/05), 923 So. 2d 118, writ denied sub nom. Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 2005-2318 (La. 3…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · March 21, 2024 · in the opinion

    Pike v. Dempster Industries, Inc. (2024)

    …test"—to evaluate proximate causation in asbestos cases arising under North Carolina law. See, e.g., Prekler v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 60 F.3d 824 (table), 1995 WL 417731, at [\3] (4th Cir. July 6…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · June 17, 2021 · in the opinion

    Gay v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)

    …Va. 1948)). The Supreme Court of Virginia has recognized that in cases of asbestos exposure, "\[a\] plaintiff may prove exposure to a particular manufacturer's product through circumstantial evidence." Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Watson, 413…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · October 25, 2022 · in the opinion

    Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)

    …evidence of exposure to a specific product on a regular basis over some extended period of time in proximity to where the plaintiff actually worked.'" (quoting Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion

    Vinson v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2021)

    …is in accord with federal courts that have routinely reached the same conclusion. See, e.g., Haislip v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 86 F.3d 1150 (table), 1996 WL 273686, at [\2] (4th Cir. May 23…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion

    Brock v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)

    …is in accord with federal courts that have routinely reached the same conclusion. See, e.g., Haislip v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 86 F.3d 1150 (table), 1996 WL 273686, at [\2] (4th Cir. May 23…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 23, 2021 · in the opinion

    Toy v. Armstrong Int'l (In re Asbestos, 2021)

    …from asbestos\] was neither known nor knowable by the application of scientific knowledge available at the time of manufacture and/or distribution" of the product. See Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 53 Cal. 3d 987…

  18. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 22, 2024 · in the opinion

    Williams v. JM Manufacturing Company, Inc. (2024)

    …to adequately warn of those potential risks, and that the lack of sufficient warning was a substantial factor in causing Cornelius's harm. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 1002, 993…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · December 27, 2022 · in the opinion

    King v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (2022)

    …When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…

  20. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 30, 2024 · in the opinion

    Brooks v. Mission Stucco Company (2024)

    …presented to the jury." (Saller, supra, 187 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1231-1232; Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995; Barker v. Lull Engineering Co. (1978) 20 Cal.3d 413…