No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

315 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”, page 7 of 16

  1. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · April 3, 2020 · in the opinion

    Rossello v. Zurich American Insurance Company (2020)

    …1974, but those policies are not relevant to this appeal. \[4\] The circuit court directed judgment in favor of Mitchell as to its cross-claims against Cross-Defendants Georgia Pacific LLC and Union Carbide Corporation. That…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · July 28, 2022 · in the opinion

    Cortez v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2022)

    …the defendant; (2) the thing had a vice or defect which created an unreasonable risk of harm; and (3) the injuries were caused by this defect.'" Smith v. Union Carbide Corp., No. 13-6323, 2014 WL…

  3. Court case · Connecticut Supreme Court · September 14, 2020 · in the opinion

    Dougan v. Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation (2020)

    …Ct. 499, 181 L. Ed. 2d 347 (2011); June v. Union Carbide Corp., 577 F.3d 1234, 1249 (10th Cir. 2009) ("It is true that a number of courts have recognized \[medical monitoring\] claims. . . premised on…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · June 17, 2021 · in the opinion

    Gay v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)

    …producing evidence that Mr. Gay was exposed to any asbestos-containing material from a Warren product. The expert report cannot establish a factual controversy. MacOueen v. Union Carbide Corp., 246 F. Supp. 3d 1004, 1014-1021 …

  5. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · November 15, 2023 · in the opinion

    Del Vescovo v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2023)

    …cannot be discovered until long after the tortious act that caused the injury has occurred ... courts have routinely applied the so-called discovery rule.' Clay v. Union Carbide Corp., 828 F.2d 1103, 1106 (5th Cir…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 18, 2021 · in the opinion

    Phipps v. Copeland Corporation LLC (2021)

    …Asbestos Cases (2020) 44 Cal.App.5th 475, 488; see Izell v. Union Carbide Corp. (2014) 231 Cal.App.4th 962, 975 (Izell) \["As our Supreme Court explained in Rutherford, \\[t\]he substantial factor standard is…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania · October 13, 2022 · in the opinion

    Gorton v. Eaton Corporation (2022)

    …upon the death is a "new claim" separate and distinct from claims asserted as survival actions. See e.g., I. Horst et al. v. Union Carbide Corp., etal., No. 15CV1903, 2017 WL 11657237, at [\5] (Pa…

  8. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · December 14, 2020 · in the opinion

    Adams v. Ethyl Corporation (2020)

    …Bougalusa, 506 So. 2d 719 (La. App. 1 Cir. 1987). It especially relies on Smith v. Union Carbide Corp., No. 13-6323, 2014 WL 4930457 (E.D. La. 2014). In Smith, the plaintiff was temporarily contracted…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 15, 2022 · in the opinion

    Stansbury v. McCARTY Corporation (2022)

    …plaintiff sued); Cambre v. Union Carbide Corp., No. 21-1067, 2022 WL 671655, at [\1], 3 (E.D. La. Mar. 7, 2022) (finding that "Dow and Union Carbide did not, as required under Canter, delegate relevant…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania · January 7, 2022 · in the opinion

    Gorton v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2022)

    …upon the death is a "new claim" separate and distinct from claims asserted as survival actions. See e.g., I. Horst et al. v. Union Carbide Corp., etal., No. 15CV1903, 2017 WL 11657237, at [\5] (Pa…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 30, 2021 · in the opinion

    Webb v. General Cable Corp. (2021)

    …Berg, at p. 637 \["\speculation' that the product \[the plaintiff\] used might have contained asbestos is insufficient"\]; Izell v. Union Carbide Corp., supra, 231 Cal.App.4th at p. 969 \["\\[P\]roof that raises mere speculation…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 21, 2021 · in the opinion

    Benavidez v. Fluor Corp. (2021)

    …causation.'" (Petitpas v. Ford Motor Co. (2017) 13 Cal.App.5th 261, 289; see Izell v. Union Carbide Corp. (2014) 231 Cal.App.4th 962, 969; McGonnell v. Kaiser Gypsum Co. (2002) 98 Cal.App.4th…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · July 6, 2020 · in the opinion

    Lopez v. McDERMOTT, Inc (2020)

    …and Root\]. The conditions found on a construction site are not a basis for strict liability." R. Doc. 499-2 at 22 (citing Smith v. Union Carbide Corp., No. CIV.A. 13-6323, 2014 WL 4930457…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Rhode Island · July 1, 2021 · in the opinion

    Moore v. Crane Company (2021)

    …it is to be "read narrowly where ... only the liability of a private company purportedly acting at the direction of a federal officer is at issue." Weese v. Union Carbide Corp., Civil No. 07-581-GPM…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 4, 2020 · in the opinion

    Gaddy v. Taylor Seidenbach, Inc. (2020)

    …180, in which the court held that a boiler insulated with asbestos did not constitute a vice or defect absent evidence that the asbestos was disturbed, and Smith v. Union Carbide Corp., No. Civ.A. 13…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 16, 2021 · in the opinion

    Cox v. Foster Wheeler (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2021)

    …512 (1988). The defense is applicable to both design defect and failure to warn claims. See, e.g., Mac Queen v. Union Carbide Corp., C.A. No. 13-831-SLR-CJB, 2013 WL 6571808, at [\3…

  17. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · July 22, 2022 · in the opinion

    Stadtler v. Aurora Pump Co. (2022)

    …cetllp.com RILEY POWER INC. Paul E. DwyerEsq., [email protected] STERLING FLUID SYSTEMS, INC, THE MARLEY COMPANY UNION CARBIDE Jacqueline A. Crockwell Esq., [email protected] WEIR VALVES & CONTROLS, USA, INC. Richard M…

  18. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 13, 2021 · in the opinion

    Vanni v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2021)

    …to support the verdict. We review the sufficiency of the evidence under the substantial evidence standard of review. (Izell v. Union Carbide Corp. (2014) 231 Cal.App.4th 962, 969.) Under that standard, we consider all…

  19. Court case · Louisiana Supreme Court · October 20, 2023 · in the opinion

    Pete v. Boland Marine and Manufacturing Company, LLC (2023)

    …$5,000,000. In my view, the highest award reasonably within the jury's discretion in this matter is $4,000,000. See Lege v. Union Carbide Corp., 20-0252 (La. App. 4 Cir. 4/1…

  20. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 27, 2021 · in the opinion

    Morgan v. JM Manufacturing Co., Inc. (2021)

    …not its sufficiency as evidence. (See Izell v. Union Carbide Corp. (2014) 231 Cal.App.4th 962, 974 \[180 Cal.Rptr.3d 382\].) It is "the province of the jury to resolve the conflicts in the…