No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

252 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 8 of 13

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · May 18, 2020 · in the opinion

    Whitehead v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2020)

    …plaintiff "\must prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product' containing asbestos in order to hold the manufacturer of that product liable." See Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · September 13, 2022 · in the opinion

    Webb v. 3M Company (2022)

    …That statement does not require the removing party to provide evidence. Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co., LLC v. Owens, 574 U.S. 81, 84 (2014) (reversing the Tenth Circuit for abuse of discretion in denying review…

  3. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of New Jersey · February 25, 2022 · in the opinion

    N RE Ltl Management, LLC (2022)

    …Id. Thus, the Original TCC's reliance on Federal-Mogul does not alter this Court's conclusion with respect to subject matter jurisdiction. \[8\] Citing In re Owens Corning, 419 F.3d 195, 212 (3d Cir…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · April 24, 2023 · in the opinion

    Hutchins v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2023)

    …When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · October 26, 2020 · in the opinion

    Robertson v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2020)

    …179, 644 S.E.2d 724 (2007) (adopting the Lohrmann test for actionable exposure in South Carolina); Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 69 F.3d 712, 716 (4th Cir. 1995) (applying the Lohrmann test in…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · January 4, 2024 · in the opinion

    Corin v. Arkema, Inc. (2024)

    …1446(a). This requirement borrows from the pleading requirements set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a). Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co., LLC v. Owens, 574 U.S. 81, 87 (2014). To satisfy this…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · March 9, 2023 · in the opinion

    Deem v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2023)

    …with maritime law, is that the plaintiff show "more than a casual or minimum contact with the product" to hold the defendant liable. Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. & Amchem Prod., 69 F.3d 712, 716 …

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · August 26, 2022 · in the opinion

    Becnel v. Lamorak Insurance Co. (2022)

    …1986); see also Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 2004-1589 (La. App. 1 Cir. 9/23/05), 923 So. 2d 118, writ denied sub nom. Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 2005-2318 (La. 3…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · March 21, 2024 · in the opinion

    Pike v. Dempster Industries, Inc. (2024)

    …plaintiff "\must prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product' containing asbestos in order to hold the manufacturer of that product liable." See Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · June 17, 2021 · in the opinion

    Gay v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)

    …Va. 1948)). The Supreme Court of Virginia has recognized that in cases of asbestos exposure, "\[a\] plaintiff may prove exposure to a particular manufacturer's product through circumstantial evidence." Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Watson, 413…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · October 25, 2022 · in the opinion

    Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)

    …evidence of exposure to a specific product on a regular basis over some extended period of time in proximity to where the plaintiff actually worked.'" (quoting Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion

    Vinson v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2021)

    …plaintiff "\must prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product' containing asbestos in order to hold the manufacturer of that product liable." See Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 15, 2023 · in the opinion

    Warrington v. 3M Company (2023)

    …any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.'" Wright v. Owens Corning, 679 F.3d 101…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Rhode Island · July 1, 2021 · in the opinion

    Moore v. Crane Company (2021)

    …precluded it from notifying individuals of the presence of asbestos in the work environment. Id. at [\4]. A similar conclusion was reached in Faulk v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 48 F. Supp. 2d 653 (E.D…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion

    Brock v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)

    …plaintiff "\must prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product' containing asbestos in order to hold the manufacturer of that product liable." See Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 23, 2021 · in the opinion

    Toy v. Armstrong Int'l (In re Asbestos, 2021)

    …from asbestos\] was neither known nor knowable by the application of scientific knowledge available at the time of manufacture and/or distribution" of the product. See Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 53 Cal. 3d 987…

  17. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 22, 2024 · in the opinion

    Williams v. JM Manufacturing Company, Inc. (2024)

    …to asbestos to members of an employee's household. J-MM argued that the trial court should "similarly find that J-MM owes no legal duty" to Cornelius, because he was not a member of Nathan…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 27, 2020 · in the opinion

    Broussard v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc. (2020)

    …PRAC. & PROC.§ 3733 (Rev. 4th ed.)(citing Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co., LLC v. Owens, 574 U.S. 81, 89 (2014)(in context of diversity removal, only a "plausible" allegation of amount in controversy is required))…

  19. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Texas · January 16, 2021 · in the opinion

    In re United Refining Company (2021)

    …3d Cir. 2010), but the accrual test still applies in the Third Circuit for plans confirmed before 2010. Wright v. Owens Corning, 679 F.3d 101, 109 (3d Cir. 2012).\[5\] Under the conduct test, a…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · December 27, 2022 · in the opinion

    King v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (2022)

    …When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…