No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

7 results for “Ford Motor Company”

  1. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · May 11, 2023

    LaFever v. Ford Motor Company (2023)

    The appellate court affirmed the trial court's order granting plaintiff Trudy LaFever a new trial after a jury verdict for Ford Motor Company, finding no abuse of discretion. A trial court's grant of a…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of Illinois · February 25, 2020

    Hicks v. Ford Motor Company (2020)

    …Crane was fraudulently joined, so Ford Motor Company's removal to federal court stood. A non-diverse defendant dismissed by involuntary summary judgment may be treated as fraudulently joined when procedural rules (waiver, and Illinois limits…

  3. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 24, 2020 · in the opinion

    Linder v. AW Chesterton Co. (2020)

    …Chicago Pneumatic Tool Company, LLC; Crane Co.; Ford Motor Company; Gardner Denver, Inc.; Genuine Parts Company; Giw Industries, Inc.; Goodrich Corporation f/k/a The BF Goodrich Company; THE Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company; Gorman Rupp Company…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · April 11, 2022 · in the opinion

    Lishman v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2022)

    …waive personal jurisdiction. The Court next turns to the merits of the personal jurisdiction defense. As discussed, personal jurisdiction is either general or specific. See Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eight Judicial District Court, 141 S…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · November 23, 2021 · in the opinion

    Johnson v. Orton (2021)

    …underpinnings" and "correctness of the expert's conclusions" may affect any ultimate determination on the merits, but do not govern admissibility. See Smith v. Ford Motor Co., 215 F.3d 713, 718-19 (7th Cir. 2000)…

  6. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · June 20, 2023 · in the opinion

    Johnson v. Edward Orton, JR. Ceramic Foundation (2023)

    …5 Ill.2d 614, 126 N.E.2d 836, 840 (1955)). "A manufacturer has a nondelegable duty to design a reasonably safe product." Jablonski v. Ford Motor Co., 353 Ill.Dec. 327, 955 N.E.2d…

  7. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · January 21, 2020 · in the opinion

    Krumwiede v. Tremco, Inc. (2020)

    …is scientifically impossible to separate out each exposure and say exposure A contributed to the person's total dose but exposure B did not." Further, they rely on Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 637 Pa. 625…