No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

15 results for “Ford Motor Company”

  1. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · December 8, 2022 · in the opinion

    In re All Matters Related TO North American Refractories Company (2022)

    …1736344" from Ex. AO for instance. An individual identified as "J.C." filed that claim with the Trust seeking compensation for injuries to her husband who worked for Ford Motor Company. J.C. submitted an affidavit…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · February 11, 2021 · in the opinion

    Data v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)

    …INC., AND ROCKWELL MANUFACTURING COMPANY; FLOWSERVE US INC., SUCCESSOR TO VALTEK INTERNATIONAL; FLSMIDTH DORR-OLIVER, INC., AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY; FLSMIDTH, INC., FMC CORPORATION, FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FOSTER WHEELER LLC…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · November 9, 2021 · in the opinion

    Data v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)

    …INC., AND ROCKWELL MANUFACTURING COMPANY; FLOWSERVE US INC., SUCCESSOR TO VALTEK INTERNATIONAL; FLSMIDTH DORR-OLIVER, INC., AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY; FLSMIDTH, INC., FMC CORPORATION, FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FOSTER WHEELER LLC…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · April 28, 2022 · in the opinion

    Smeal v. Clark Equipment Company (2022)

    …product caused his harm, from those in which such likelihood is absent on account of only casual or minimal exposure to the defendant's product." Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 151 A.3d 1032 (Pa. 2016) …

  5. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 17, 2024 · in the opinion

    Constantine v. Lenox Instrument Company (2024)

    …present purposes. Generally speaking, motions in limine are used to preclude the presentation of evidence that a party considers inadmissible or prejudicial. See Parr v. Ford Motor Co., 109 A.3d 682, 690 (Pa. Super. 2014…

  6. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · February 21, 2020 · in the opinion

    Brandt v. Bon-Ton Stores, Inc. (2020)

    …regularity, and proximity such that a fact-finder may infer that the plaintiff's exposure was a substantial factor in causing her harm. Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 151 A.3d 1032, 1052-53 (Pa. 2016…

  7. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 17, 2024 · in the opinion

    Constantine v. Lenox Instrument Co., Inc. (2024)

    …establish proximate \[or legal\] causation, a plaintiff must adduce evidence to show that the defendant's act was a substantial factor in bringing about the plaintiff's harm." Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 637 Pa. 625…

  8. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 10, 2024 · in the opinion

    Fisher v. American International Industries (2024)

    …containing product was sufficiently \frequent, regular and proximate' to support a jury's finding that \[the\] defendant's product was substantially causative of the disease." Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 151 A.3d 1032, 1044 (Pa…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania · July 21, 2020 · in the opinion

    Gorton v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2020)

    …to the claims at issue. (ECF No. 408 at 10-14.) Defendants rely on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's decision in Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 151 A.3d 1032 (Pa. 2016), which held that "expert…

  10. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · March 24, 2020 · in the opinion

    Schrader v. Ameron International Corporation (2020)

    …Ford Motor Co., 160 A.3d 1135 (Del. 2017) (unpublished disposition at 2017 WL 1422626 [\3]). In Walls, the decedent was exposed to asbestos from, among other sources, brake changes performed on Ford vehicles in the…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · January 7, 2022 · in the opinion

    Data v. Joy Global Underground Mining (2022)

    …where they have unquestionably suffered harm on account of a disease having a long latency period and must prove specific causation under prevailing Pennsylvania law which may be insurmountable." Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 637 Pa…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · June 12, 2023 · in the opinion

    Finello v. Foster Wheeler LLC (2023)

    …fibers. We agree with Tragarz Court's approach and adopt it here. Gregg v. V-J Auto Parts Company, 943 A.2d at 225-226. In Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 151 A.3d 1032 (Pa…

  13. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · February 19, 2020 · in the opinion

    Roverano v. John Crane, Inc. (2020)

    …actual, product-specific causation in many asbestos cases, the courts have come to accept abstract assessments of increased risk as proxies for traditional substantial-factor causation. See Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 637 Pa. 625, 668…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania · October 13, 2022 · in the opinion

    Gorton v. Eaton Corporation (2022)

    …2022 WL 1265532, at [\5] (quoting Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 151 A.3d 1032 (Pa. 2016)). "\[T\]o determine whether plaintiff has provided sufficient evidence that defendant's products were the cause of plaintiff's…

  15. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 4, 2023 · in the opinion

    Mullen v. American Circuit Breaker Corporation (2023)

    …disease by the product of each particular defendant. Vanaman, \[966 A.2d\] at 607. See also Rost v. Ford Company, 151 A.3d 1032 (Pa. 2016) (emphasizing that "frequent, regular, and proximate" test in this context…