5 results for “Ford Motor Company”
-
Court case · South Carolina Court of Appeals · September 1, 2021 · in the opinion
Jolly v. General Elec. Co. (2021)
…the product."). In Branham v. Ford Motor Company, our supreme court refined the risk-utility test to incorporate the American Law Institute's most recent definition of a design defect: A product ... is defective in design…
-
Court case · South Carolina Supreme Court · February 28, 2024 · in the opinion
Edwards v. Scapa Waycross, Inc. (2024)
…the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania's opinion in Rost v. Ford Motor Company\[2\] and claims the court of appeals improperly approved the use of the cumulative dose theory rejected in Henderson and Lohrmann. We disagree…
-
Court case · South Carolina Supreme Court · August 21, 2024 · in the opinion
Jolly v. Fisher Controls International, LLC (2024)
…831 (citations omitted). In Riley, following a motor vehicle accident involving Benjamin Riley and Andrew Marshall Carter II, Riley's estate sued both Carter and the Ford Motor Company. Riley alleged that Carter had failed to…
-
Court case · South Carolina Court of Appeals · April 5, 2023 · in the opinion
Glenn v. 3M Co. (2023)
…been anticipated by the manufacturer or seller...." Small, 329 S.C. at 466, 494 S.E.2d at 844. Fisher cites Branham v. Ford Motor Co., 390 S.C. 203, 210, 701 S.E.2d 5…
-
Court case · South Carolina Court of Appeals · August 3, 2022 · in the opinion
Edwards v. Scapa Waycross, Inc. (2022)
625, 151 A.3d 1032, 1044 (2016)); see also Yates v. Ford Motor Co., 113 F. Supp. 3d 841, 846 (E.D.N.C. 2015) ("Also referred to as \any exposure' theory, or \single fiber' theory…