No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

6 results for “Ford Motor Company”

  1. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · February 22, 2021

    Jack v. Dco, LLC (2021)

    The Ninth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for Union Pacific Railroad and judgment as a matter of law for Ford and DCo, so the Jacks lost on all claims. Under Washington law, a take-home exposure claim…

  2. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · February 22, 2022 · in the opinion

    Budd v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. (2022)

    …v. KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY, INC.; Appellant, Borgwarner Morse Tec Inc.; Certainteed Corporation; DAP, Inc.; Ford Motor Company; Honeywell International Inc., Individually and as successor to Allied Signal, Inc. and The Bendix Corporation; Metropolitan Life Insurance Company…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · December 21, 2021 · in the opinion

    United States Fidelity and Guaranty v. Ulbricht (2021)

    …F/V St. Patrick, 816 F.2d 1345, 1352 (9th Cir. 1987) (quoting Polk v. Ford Motor Co., 529 F.2d 259, 271 (8th Cir. 1976)), opinion modified on reh'g, 866 F.2d 318 (9th…

  4. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · February 19, 2020 · in the opinion

    Coogan v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec Inc. (2020)

    …We agree with the Coogans. a. Legal Principles In Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co., the Supreme Court adopted the rule of strict liability for product manufacturers stated in § 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts (Am…

  5. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · September 16, 2024 · in the opinion

    Sorrentino v. Ammco Tools, Inc. (2024)

    …Law Ins. 1965). Lenhardt v. Ford Motor Co., 102 Wn.2d 208, 211, 683 P.2d 1097 (1984). Under those principles: (1) One who sells any product in a defective condition unreasonably dangerous to the user…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Washington · September 27, 2021 · in the opinion

    Strong v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2021)

    …because the district court has a statutory duty to order a competency hearing where a criminal defendant's mental disease makes him unable to assist properly in his defense) with Kline v. Ford Motor Co., Inc.…