21 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 1 of 2
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · August 11, 2022
Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)
Laura Walls sued Ford Motor Company and other defendants individually and as executor of her husband Robie Walls' estate. He died of mesothelioma in 2020. After a Navy tour from 1955 to 1959, he worked about…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · July 15, 2020
Coates v. Ford Motor Company (2020)
The Court of Special Appeals affirmed the judgment for Ford Motor Company after retrial, rejecting the Coates estate's challenges to the denial of partial summary judgment, the denial of a new trial, and the refusal…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · September 27, 2021
Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2021)
Laura Walls sued Ford, Pneumo Abex and other companies on behalf of the estate of her husband, Robie Walls, and for her own loss of consortium. She alleged that exposure to their asbestos-containing products caused…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 25, 2021
Putt v. Ford Motor Co. (In re Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2021)
…a new trial on apportionment of fault among Ford, other automakers and brake pad makers/suppliers and on the amount of punitive damages. Where the jury found Ford's brake pads defective and a substantial factor…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · March 24, 2022
Marino v. Abex Corporation (2022)
The Appellate Division affirmed the judgment for plaintiff Deborah Marino against Ford Motor Company, upholding the discovery sanctions; it found one hearsay ruling erroneous but harmless. A trial court may sanction a party for violating a…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · February 22, 2022 · in the opinion
Budd v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. (2022)
…v. KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY, INC.; Appellant, Borgwarner Morse Tec Inc.; Certainteed Corporation; DAP, Inc.; Ford Motor Company; Honeywell International Inc., Individually and as successor to Allied Signal, Inc. and The Bendix Corporation; Metropolitan Life Insurance Company…
-
Court case · Iowa Court of Appeals · August 31, 2022 · in the opinion
Fankhauser v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2022)
…Thomas Michael Boes, Des Moines, and Jason Madden of Bradshaw, Fowler, Proctor & Fairgrave, Des Moines, for appellee Ford Motor Company. Deere & Company, self-represented. Considered by Bower, C.J., and Vaitheswaran, and Schumacher, JJ. SCHUMACHER, Judge.…
-
Court case · Iowa Court of Appeals · September 21, 2022 · in the opinion
Fankhauser v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2022)
…Boes and Jason T. Madden of Bradshaw, Fowler, Proctor & Fairgrave, P.C., Des Moines, for appellee Ford Motor Company. Deere & Company, self-represented. Considered by Bower, C.J., and Vaitheswaran, and Schumacher, JJ. SCHUMACHER, Judge. Our…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · February 19, 2020 · in the opinion
Coogan v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec Inc. (2020)
…We agree with the Coogans. a. Legal Principles In Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co., the Supreme Court adopted the rule of strict liability for product manufacturers stated in § 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts (Am…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 10, 2024 · in the opinion
Fisher v. American International Industries (2024)
…containing product was sufficiently \frequent, regular and proximate' to support a jury's finding that \[the\] defendant's product was substantially causative of the disease." Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 151 A.3d 1032, 1044 (Pa…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · March 24, 2020 · in the opinion
Schrader v. Ameron International Corporation (2020)
…Ford Motor Co., 160 A.3d 1135 (Del. 2017) (unpublished disposition at 2017 WL 1422626 [\3]). In Walls, the decedent was exposed to asbestos from, among other sources, brake changes performed on Ford vehicles in the…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · September 16, 2024 · in the opinion
Sorrentino v. Ammco Tools, Inc. (2024)
…Law Ins. 1965). Lenhardt v. Ford Motor Co., 102 Wn.2d 208, 211, 683 P.2d 1097 (1984). Under those principles: (1) One who sells any product in a defective condition unreasonably dangerous to the user…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 19, 2020 · in the opinion
Mata v. Liberty Utilities (park Water) Corp. (2020)
…Ford Motor Co. (1982) 32 Cal.3d 388, 402, a former Ford engineer and manager testified that Ford knew of the problem with the brakes on its Continental models because Ford had received customer and dealer…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 29, 2024 · in the opinion
Watts v. Pneumo Abex, LLC (2024)
…in brakes sold to end users. Various entities, including Bendix, Ford, and General Motors, purchased asbestos-containing friction material from Abex, [\256] but its most significant business came from Rayloc, which manufactured brake products that were…
-
Court case · South Carolina Court of Appeals · August 3, 2022 · in the opinion
Edwards v. Scapa Waycross, Inc. (2022)
625, 151 A.3d 1032, 1044 (2016)); see also Yates v. Ford Motor Co., 113 F. Supp. 3d 841, 846 (E.D.N.C. 2015) ("Also referred to as \any exposure' theory, or \single fiber' theory…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · March 2, 2021 · in the opinion
Neely EX rel. Estate OF Goehring v. Union Carbide Corporation (2021)
…record indicates that the Union Carbide products at issue contained chrysotile fibers, but none of the attached studies specifically looked at that type of fiber. See Yates v. Ford Motor Co., 113 F. Supp. 3d 841…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 18, 2021 · in the opinion
Phipps v. Copeland Corporation LLC (2021)
…(Cf. Buell-Wilson v. Ford Motor Co. (2006) 141 Cal.App.4th 525, 553 \[jury's award of 13 times the amount counsel for plaintiffs requested in noneconomic damages and three times the amount requested for…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · January 21, 2020 · in the opinion
Krumwiede v. Tremco, Inc. (2020)
…is scientifically impossible to separate out each exposure and say exposure A contributed to the person's total dose but exposure B did not." Further, they rely on Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 637 Pa. 625…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · January 18, 2021 · in the opinion
Erhardt v. Bmw OF North America, LLC (2021)
…BMW NA Mem. Frank & Zhang at 18-20 (collecting cases); see, e.g., Anderson v. Ford Motor Co., 950 F. Supp. 2d 1217, 1225 (D. Utah 2013) (noting that "a growing number of courts have determined…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · July 13, 2022 · in the opinion
Cortez v. Lamorak Ins. Co. (2022)
…the argument that plaintiff's disease "cannot be caused by a certain type of asbestos" and that this defense can be considered by the jury when determining causation); Michel v. Ford Motor Co., No. 18-4738…