No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

4 results for “Ford Motor Company”

  1. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · February 22, 2021

    Jack v. Dco, LLC (2021)

    The Ninth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for Union Pacific Railroad and judgment as a matter of law for Ford and DCo, so the Jacks lost on all claims. Under Washington law, a take-home exposure claim…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Montana · August 9, 2023 · in the opinion

    Wells v. BNSF Railway Company (2023)

    …2019 WL 2150949, at [\6] (E.D. Cal. May 16, 2019) (emphasis in original) (citation omitted); see also Pierson v. Ford Motor Co., 2008 WL 7074289, at [\2] (N.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2008). The Court…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maine · September 16, 2020 · in the opinion

    Coffin v. Ametek, Inc. (2020)

    …2018 WL 3819027, at [\16] (W.D. Wash. Aug. 10, 2018) (quoting Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 151 A.3d 1032, 1045 (Pa. 2016)). Nevertheless, as the court in Jack explained, "\[t\]hese \irrefutable scientific fact…

  4. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · June 22, 2021 · in the opinion

    Staubs v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (2021)

    …103 Harv. L. Rev. 1989, 1989-97 (1990)). Maryland follows the separate disease rule in toxic exposure cases. See Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Ford, 204 Md. App. 1, 268 (2012) (Eyler, D., J., concurring in part…