16 results for “Ford Motor Company”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · August 26, 2022 · in the opinion
Becnel v. Lamorak Insurance Co. (2022)
…exposed to asbestos from Ford vehicles, plaintiffs' claims stand. Accordingly, Ford's motion for summary judgment is DENIED. v. Navistar, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment Navistar, Inc. (f/k/a International Harvester Company) contends that…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 1, 2022
Labarre v. Bienville Auto Parts Inc. (2022)
…It denied the motion on negligence, because Bienville's two witnesses conflicted on whether the company knew the brakes contained asbestos and that asbestos was dangerous. It also denied the motion on the sophisticated-user defense…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · August 8, 2022 · in the opinion
Becnel v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2022)
…Insurance Company, Bayer CropScience, Inc., BMW of North America, LLC, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London and London Market Companies, Eagle, Inc., Ford Motor Company, Foster Wheeler LLC, General Electric Company, ViacomCBS Inc., Gulf Engineering Company…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · August 25, 2022 · in the opinion
Becnel v. Lamorak Insurance Co. (2022)
…have also joined and adopted these various motions, including American Insurance Company, International Paper Company, Uniroyal Holding, Inc., Pneumo Abex, LLC, BMW of North America, LLC, Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., Ford Motor Company, gulf Engineering…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 23, 2021 · in the opinion
Brindell v. Carlisle Industrial Brake and Friction Inc. (2021)
…death."\[128\] During oral argument, Removing Defendants cited Michel v. Ford Motor Company\[129\] and Smith v. Union Carbide\[130\] to support these arguments. When conducting a summary inquiry, the Court determines only whether the plaintiff…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · September 16, 2020 · in the opinion
Dempster v. Lamorak Ins. Co. (2020)
…1096, 2016 WL 3966142, at [\6] (M.D. Fla. June 30, 2016); Yates v. Ford Motor Co., No. 12-752, 2015 WL 3463559, at [\10] (E.D.N.C. May 30, 2015). \[49\] See Dugas, No…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · September 28, 2021 · in the opinion
Krutz v. Huntington Ingalls Inc. (2021)
…testimony, fact or expert, to show that Amchem's asbestos products were a substantial factor in causing his disease. Cf. Michel v. Ford Motor Co., No. 18-4738, 2019 WL 118007, at [\3] (E.D. La…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 29, 2020 · in the opinion
Estes v. Eaton Corporation (2020)
…authority cited by Estes, where the trial court specifically mentioned and rejected plaintiff's expert testimony as "\completely lacking in probative force.' "(See Meiner v. Ford Motor Co. (1971) 17 Cal.App.3d 127, 134-135.…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maine · September 16, 2020 · in the opinion
Coffin v. Ametek, Inc. (2020)
…2018 WL 3819027, at [\16] (W.D. Wash. Aug. 10, 2018) (quoting Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 151 A.3d 1032, 1045 (Pa. 2016)). Nevertheless, as the court in Jack explained, "\[t\]hese \irrefutable scientific fact…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 1, 2021 · in the opinion
Hulin v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc. (2021)
…testimony, fact or expert, to show that AmChem's asbestos products were a substantial factor in causing his lung cancer. Cf. Michel v. Ford Motor Co., No. 18-4738, 2019 WL 118007, at [\3] (E.D…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · July 13, 2022 · in the opinion
Cortez v. Lamorak Ins. Co. (2022)
…the argument that plaintiff's disease "cannot be caused by a certain type of asbestos" and that this defense can be considered by the jury when determining causation); Michel v. Ford Motor Co., No. 18-4738…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 22, 2020 · in the opinion
Gomez v. Aardvark Contractors, Inc. (2020)
…Court, E.D. Louisiana. Cary Gomez, Chucky R. Gomez, Norma C. Gomez, Brittany G. Ford & Chance J. Gomez, Plaintiffs, represented by Damon R. Pourciau, Ardoin Law Firm, Scott Michael Galante, Galante & Bivalacqua LLC & Stephanie Moore Hartman…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 22, 2020 · in the opinion
Gomez v. Aardvark Contractors, Inc. (2020)
…Court, E.D. Louisiana. Cary Gomez, Chucky R. Gomez, Norma C. Gomez, Brittany G. Ford & Chance J. Gomez, Plaintiffs, represented by Damon R. Pourciau, Ardoin Law Firm, Scott Michael Galante, Galante & Bivalacqua LLC & Stephanie Moore Hartman…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 6, 2020 · in the opinion
Gomez v. Aardvark Contractors, Inc. (2020)
…Court, E.D. Louisiana. Cary Gomez, Chucky R. Gomez, Norma C. Gomez, Brittany G. Ford & Chance J. Gomez, Plaintiffs, represented by Damon R. Pourciau, Ardoin Law Firm, Scott Michael Galante, Galante & Bivalacqua LLC & Stephanie Moore Hartman…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 13, 2020 · in the opinion
Gomez v. Aardvark Contractors, Inc. (2020)
…Wrongful Death was filed by Plaintiffs Norma Gomez, Chance Gomez, Chucky Gomez (f/k/a Robin Patrick Newby, II), and Brittany Ford (collectively, "Plaintiffs"), the surviving heirs of Cary Gomez, who died on November 12, 2018…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 15, 2022 · in the opinion
Stansbury v. McCARTY Corporation (2022)
…AND REASONS IVAN L.R. LEMELLE, District Judge. Before the Court are defendants Bertram C. Hopeman and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, as alleged insurer of Hopeman's alleged executive officers Albert Arendt Hopeman, Jr., Bertram C…