12 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of Illinois · February 25, 2020
Hicks v. Ford Motor Company (2020)
…that defendant. Asbestos Bankruptcies; Personal Jurisdiction; Venue, Removal and Transfer Worksites: City of Bloomington, Bloomington; General Electric City of Bloomington employee working with fleet vehicles City of Bloomington Bloomington; husband of General Electric worker General Electric
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · November 10, 2020 · in the opinion
Longobardi v. Honeywell International Inc. (2020)
…CUMMINS, INC., DCO, LLC, EATON CORPORATION, f/k/a Cutler-Hammer, FEDERAL MOGUL ASBESTOS PERSONAL INJURY TRUST, successor to Fel-Pro, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, JOHN CRANE, INC., KELSEY-HAYES COMPANY, MACK TRUCKS, INC., MOTION CONTROL INDUSTRIES…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · May 17, 2024 · in the opinion
Ramirez v. Avon Products, Inc. (2024)
…This consideration is addressed in Cholipski, which discussed Laue and our supreme court's later decision in Cook v. General Electric Company, 146 Ill 2d 548 (1992), which made clear that while contribution claims must be…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · January 31, 2024
Pelton v. John Crane, Inc. (2024)
…may seek punitive damages. Under maritime law, a plaintiff may show substantial-factor causation through admissible general expert testimony plus circumstantial evidence of substantial exposure over a substantial period, without expert testimony specific to the defendant…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · November 23, 2021
Johnson v. Orton (2021)
…Circuit's Krik decision. It limited Monona Rossol to ceramics, as agreed. It limited Dr. Barry Castleman to general historical testimony, barring opinions on Vanderbilt's knowledge, motives or lobbying. It allowed Dr. William Longo's…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · April 14, 2022 · in the opinion
Daniels v. Venta Corp. (2022)
…Associates (SIPA). At that time, the defendant Robert Boey was a general partner of both ABC and SIPA. None of the defendants informed Daniels that the debris he was directed to remove contained asbestos. In 2017…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · June 20, 2023 · in the opinion
Johnson v. Edward Orton, JR. Ceramic Foundation (2023)
…product." Id. (quoting Calles, 309 Ill.Dec. 383, 864 N.E.2d at 264) (citing Sobczak v. General Motors Corp., 373 Ill.App.3d 910, 312 Ill.Dec. 682, 871 N.E.2d 82, 94 (2007…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · January 21, 2020 · in the opinion
Krumwiede v. Tremco, Inc. (2020)
…the Mono caulk. While working with decedent, they worked in locations where insulators were present and wrapping pipes in their vicinity or general area. Schultz did not know if the insulators created any dust. Darr testified…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 24, 2020 · in the opinion
Linder v. AW Chesterton Co. (2020)
…of personal jurisdiction, arguing that it is a Georgia corporation with its principal place of business in Georgia and had no contacts with Illinois to subject it to the circuit court's general jurisdiction. As to…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · April 11, 2022 · in the opinion
Lishman v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2022)
…these reasons, Alfa Laval did not waive personal jurisdiction. The Court next turns to the merits of the personal jurisdiction defense. As discussed, personal jurisdiction is either general or specific. See Ford Motor Co. v. Montana…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · December 7, 2021 · in the opinion
Jones v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2021)
…marks omitted.) Id. In contrast, a defendant who understands the general objectives of a conspiratorial scheme and agrees to do its part to further those objectives is liable as a conspirator. Id. ¶ 13 Because a conspiracy…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · May 11, 2023 · in the opinion
LaFever v. Ford Motor Company (2023)
…merely indicated that defendant's request No. 29 (and the other remaining requests in defendant's general motion in limine) was "PASSED." ¶ 8 Toward the end of April and into the early part of May 2018…