No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

11 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · Maryland Appellate Court · February 8, 2024

    Basil-Flippen v. General Electric Company (2024)

    …Campbell Company installing asbestos insulation on a turbine at the Morgantown Generating Station in Maryland. The turbine was sold to the Potomac Electric Power Company by Westinghouse, which also had a separate contract to install it…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · September 9, 2021

    Murphy v. Union Carbide Corporation (2021)

    …vessel, do not suffice. Government Contractor Defense and Removal; Venue, Removal and Transfer Worksites: Bethlehem Steel Key Highway Shipyard; Key Highway Shipyard, Baltimore Shipyard worker — helper, electrical equipment; apprentice electrician Key Highway Shipyard Baltimore 1973-1974

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · August 14, 2020

    Hailey v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation (2020)

    The estate and family of Charles Anthony Shockley sued several equipment makers after he died of pleural mesothelioma in January 2016. Mr. Shockley served in the Navy from 1968 to 1972 as a machinist mate on the destroyer USS Henderson, working…

  4. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Maryland · March 2, 2020 · in the opinion

    In re RailWORKS Corporation (2020)

    …their respective positions. The parties also do not dispute certain key material facts, including when Mr. Reibie worked as an electrician and allegedly was exposed to asbestos, when Mr. Reibie was diagnosed with cancer, and that…

  5. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Maryland · August 8, 2020 · in the opinion

    In re RailWORKS Corporation (2020)

    …their respective positions. The parties also do not dispute certain key material facts, including when Mr. Reibie worked as an electrician and allegedly was exposed to asbestos, when Mr. Reibie was diagnosed with cancer, and that…

  6. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · May 31, 2022 · in the opinion

    Irwin Industrial Tool Company v. Pifer (2022)

    …be produced. Irwin's counsel also argued that the Estate could not prove its strict liability manufacturing defect claim because it could not satisfy factors set forth in Phipps v. General Motors Corp., 278 Md. 337…

  7. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · July 15, 2020 · in the opinion

    Coates v. Ford Motor Company (2020)

    …of a summary judgment motion, as well as foregoing the ruling on such a motion either temporarily until later in the proceedings or for resolution by trial of the general issue, involves not only pure legal…

  8. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · April 3, 2020 · in the opinion

    Rossello v. Zurich American Insurance Company (2020)

    …INSURANCE LAW—INDEMNITY—COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL LIABILITY POLICIES—APPORTIONMENT—PRO RATA—TRIGGER OF COVERAGE—INJURY-IN-FACT TRIGGER—CONTINUOUS TRIGGER The Court of Appeals held that damages from a continuous bodily injury judgment must be allocated on…

  9. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · March 3, 2020 · in the opinion

    Pinner v. Pinner (2020)

    …541, 552 (1995), we noted that in contrast to general jurisdiction, an analysis of specific jurisdiction involves more of an expanded factual inquiry into the precise nature of the defendant's contacts with the forum, the…

  10. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · September 1, 2021 · in the opinion

    Pifer v. Irwin Industrial Tool Co. (2021)

    …media evidence is authentic by a preponderance of the evidence," id. at 597—flows from the same general overarching principle: when determining authenticity, the court looks at the relative likelihood that the evidence is what it…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · June 12, 2020 · in the opinion

    Curtin v. Cyprus Amax Minerals Co. (2020)

    …General personal jurisdiction exists if the defendant maintains "continuous and systematic" contacts with the forum state. Helicopteros Nacionales de Columbia v. Hall, 466 U.S. 408, 416 (1984). With a corporate defendant, general jurisdiction typically exists…