No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

7 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · April 24, 2020 · in the opinion

    RW Beckett Corp. v. Allianz Global Corp. (2020)

    …which was in effect from February 1, 1981, through February 1, 1984, included comprehensive general liability coverage. ECF Doc. 1-5 at 1, 37. The policy set an aggregate bodily injury limit of $500,000 and…

  2. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · June 30, 2022

    Milone v. Aii Acquisition Corp., LLC (2022)

    …602, a worker's testimony that furnace boards were asbestos, based on general talk among workers and assumption without training or testing, lacks personal knowledge. An expert relying only on that testimony cannot establish exposure to…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · May 11, 2023 · in the opinion

    Parker Hannifin Corp. v. Standard Motor Products, Inc. (2023)

    …(Doc. No. 89-37 at PageID\# 3403.) Parker Hannifin's General Counsel, Joseph Pophal, emailed Standard Motor's General Counsel, Carmine Broccole, writing: Parker tendered 100% of Parker's defense of the Barr case to Standard…

  4. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · December 2, 2022 · in the opinion

    Nuckols v. Consol. Rail Corp. (2022)

    …Decedent reasonably did not know the purpose of the questioning. Perhaps Decedent could only have reasonably been expected to know of general impacts of the exposure to his health, but not that it could cause cancer…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · April 23, 2020 · in the opinion

    Parker Hannifin Corp. v. Standard Motor Products, Inc. (2020)

    …not, the Court finds that an interlocutory appeal cannot be said to materially affect the outcome of the instant case. See e.g., In re General Motors LLC, 2019 WL 8403402 at [\1] (6th Cir. Sept…

  6. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · April 6, 2023 · in the opinion

    Taylor v. BASF Catalysts, LLC (2023)

    …According to Bevan, the case was dismissed because they were unable to find a co-worker at General Tire who could testify about the decedent's occupational exposure to asbestos. The Clark Lawsuit {¶ 15} On October…

  7. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · August 6, 2020 · in the opinion

    Maddy v. Honeywell Internatl., Inc. (2020)

    …tasks those employees regularly performed. Bonded Brake Program {¶ 23} To assist Flxible in starting a bonded brake business, Flxible's parent corporation, General Automotive Corporation, acquired a brake company located in Jackson, Michigan. At that time…