No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

12 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · August 9, 2021

    Paroni EX rel. Estate OF Paroni v. General Electric UK Holdings Ltd. (2021)

    …in New York. Jurisdictional discovery showed that General Electric UK Holdings Ltd (GEUKH) held the Ruston liabilities. GEUKH moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The court agreed. It found no general jurisdiction, because GEUKH…

  2. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · July 21, 2021

    Wallace v. Trane Company (2021)

    The Superior Court granted General Electric's motion for summary judgment on all counts because the Wallace plaintiffs failed to show that Mr. Wallace was exposed to asbestos from an original GE product. Under Maine law…

  3. Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 25, 2023 · in the opinion

    Bassier v. AO Smith Water Prods. Co. (2023)

    …HOLDINGS, INC., FORMERLY KNOWN AS DUNHAM-BUSH, INC., FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC, GARDNER DENVER, INC, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, GOULD ELECTRONICS INC, GOULDS PUMPS LLC, GRINNELL LLC, HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., F/K/A ALLIED SIGNAL, INC./BENDIX…

  4. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · October 27, 2020 · in the opinion

    Wallace v. Trane Company (2020)

    …Esq., for Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.; The Gage Company, Inc. Jeffrey M. Thomen, Esq., for General Electric Co.; The Heil Company. Mary C. Dunn, Esq., for Metropolitan Life Insurance. David H. Stillman, Esq., for R.W. Beckett…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · May 21, 2020 · in the opinion

    Woolard v. Carrier Corporation (2020)

    …Mr. Woolard did not mention Foxboro at all during his deposition, and there is no indication that his general testimony covers instrument features specific to (and therefore capable of identifying) Foxboro products. A second fact witness…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · June 16, 2022 · in the opinion

    Thorne v. Crane Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2022)

    …Id. at 611. The plaintiff removed the thermal insulation blankets for overhauling the turbine as part of general maintenance. Id. The plaintiff alleged he breathed asbestos dust after the blankets were removed and while cleaning the…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 18, 2021 · in the opinion

    Phipps v. Copeland Corporation LLC (2021)

    …exposed to asbestos as a result of living for periods with his father, who as an electrician in the Navy came into contact with "asbestos-containing thermal insulation material." Mesothelioma, according to Copeland's medical expert…

  8. Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 10, 2020

    Richards v. American Biltrite (Matter of Eighth Jud. Dis. Asbestos, 2020)

    …could not have contributed to the plaintiff's disease. Even if it did, competing expert affidavits on general and specific causation raise fact issues for trial. Causation; Product Identification; Expert Testimony Worksites: grocery stores in Buffalo…

  9. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · June 30, 2022

    Milone v. Aii Acquisition Corp., LLC (2022)

    …602, a worker's testimony that furnace boards were asbestos, based on general talk among workers and assumption without training or testing, lacks personal knowledge. An expert relying only on that testimony cannot establish exposure to…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · March 3, 2020 · in the opinion

    Paroni EX rel. Estate OF Paroni v. Alstom SA (2020)

    …contacts with New York, Elodie relies most heavily on Alstom's website's statement that its "U.S. Headquarters" are in New York to argue that Alstom is subject to general jurisdiction here. See Pl. Mem…

  11. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · August 20, 2024 · in the opinion

    Freitas v. AO Smith Water Products Corporation (2024)

    …document. See Third Am. Complaint (hereinafter, Compl.). \[3\] General personal jurisdiction need not be addressed in this decision, as PBV is not incorporated in Rhode Island, nor is its principal place of business in Rhode Island…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 4, 2021 · in the opinion

    Swanson v. The Marley-Wylain Co. (2021)

    …If the instruction is incomplete or erroneous the trial judge may, as he did here, properly refuse it."'" (Olive v. General Nutrition Centers, Inc. (2018) 30 Cal.App.5th 804, 813 \[242 Cal.Rptr.3d 15\]…