No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

10 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · June 18, 2020 · in the opinion

    Kruse v. Actuant Corporation (2020)

    … 3.) After his military service, Mr. Jimenez was "honorably discharged as the civilian equivalent of a Certified Aircraft Electrical Mechanic and Technician." (Id.) Apart from his service, Mr. Jimenez also "performed both supervisorial and hands-on…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 8, 2021

    Carnes v. General Dynamics Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2021)

    The magistrate judge recommended granting General Dynamics' motion for summary judgment against the Carnes plaintiffs because they produced no evidence that Mr. Carnes was exposed to an asbestos-containing product attributable to General Dynamics. Under Texas…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · June 28, 2021

    Klick v. Asbestos Corporation, Ltd. (2021)

    The court granted Boeing's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, finding no general or specific jurisdiction over Boeing in New Jersey, denied jurisdictional discovery, and declined to transfer the claims, so Boeing won…

  4. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · October 1, 2021 · in the opinion

    Dietrich v. Boeing Company (2021)

    …which creates an exception to the general rule denying appellate review of remand orders for "an order remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed pursuant to section 1442 or 1443 of…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · January 10, 2025 · in the opinion

    Holste v. 3M Company (2025)

    …cv-09814-JLS-E. January 10, 2025. United States District Court, C.D. California. CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL JOSEPHINE L. STATON, District Judge. (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO REMAND (Doc. 34) Before the Court is…

  6. Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 5, 2020 · in the opinion

    English v. Johnson & Johnson (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)

    …2). The July 12, 2019 Decision and Order stated that there is no general jurisdiction because the defendants are not incorporated, nor maintain their principal places of business in the State of New York. It was…

  7. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · March 9, 2021 · in the opinion

    Williams v. Lockheed Martin Corporation (2021)

    … 1442(a). "Unlike the general removal statute, the federal officer removal statute is to be \broadly construed' in favor of a federal forum."\[15\] A defendant must meet four requirements to properly remove a case under…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · July 15, 2021 · in the opinion

    Klick v. Asbestos Corporation, Ltd. (2021)

    …Instead, Defendant reiterates its arguments regarding general jurisdiction and misconstrues Plaintiffs' arguments regarding Abex's New Jersey facility, stating that "Plaintiffs' position that Abex's research and development department in New Jersey constitutes its principal place…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Nevada · September 19, 2022 · in the opinion

    Potter v. Crane Co. (2022)

    …on a theory of successor liability, they must establish a prima facie showing of an exception to the general principal that "when one corporation sells all of its assets to another, the purchaser is not liable…

  10. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · February 26, 2021 · in the opinion

    Williams v. Seidenbach (2021)

    …2d 25, 40 (D.D.C. 2007) ("As a general rule, questions of federal law in MDL-transferred cases are governed by the law of the transferee circuit."); In re Korean Air Lines Disaster of Sept…