No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

18 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 6, 2020

    Rivera v. General Electric Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)

    The trial court denied General Electric's motion for summary judgment on workers' compensation exclusivity grounds and, alternatively, on punitive damages, so plaintiffs' claims against GE proceed. Workers' compensation exclusivity bars only injuries arising from employment…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 31, 2023

    Elorreaga v. Rockwell Automation, Inc. (2023)

    The federal district court denied summary judgment motions by General Electric, ViacomCBS, Air & Liquid Systems and Warren Pumps, and granted the Elorreaga family's motion for partial summary judgment that the government contractor defense does not…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · June 17, 2021

    Gay v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)

    The district court granted General Electric's motion for summary judgment because the plaintiff, executor of Carl Gay's estate, did not show he was exposed to asbestos from a GE product with enough frequency, regularity…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · March 28, 2022

    Pritt v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2022)

    The court denied General Electric's motion to exclude plaintiffs' industrial hygiene expert Dr. Tsai and denied as moot its motion to exclude Capt. Burger. It granted GE summary judgment on the Navy-service claims, denied…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · January 26, 2021

    Behrmann v. Abb, Inc. (2021)

    …Island shipyard; Todd Shipyards; Lockheed Shipyard, Seattle; Todd Shipyard, Seattle; U.S. Navy journeyman electrician, later supervisor Lockheed Shipyard Seattle 1962-1988; worked at shipyard Todd Shipyard Seattle; electrician's mate U.S. Navy 1958-1962

  6. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 17, 2020

    Rivera v. Meriden Molded Plastic (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)

    …Product Identification; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: General Electric Schenectady Works; New York; General Electric, Schenectady, Schenectady apprentice and union electrician (IBEW Local 3) New York 1956-1975; electrician and elevator mechanic General Electric, Schenectady Schenectady…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · April 5, 2024 · in the opinion

    Speck v. CBS Corporation (2024)

    …Speck was to any work done on or around a General Electric product or product of another defendant\[,\]" and has "no idea" about the quantity of asbestos fibers to which Speck may have been exposed by…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · June 17, 2021 · in the opinion

    Gay v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)

    …Defendant's asbestos-containing products. On October 11, 2019, Defendant General Electric Co. filed a Notice of Removal to the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania under 28 U.S.C. § 1446…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · January 19, 2021 · in the opinion

    Robertson v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2021)

    …worked on: Cutler-Hammer, Squire D., Siemens, Ellis, Allen-Bradley, Westinghouse, and General Electric. Id. at 101:8-22. Eaton has liability for Cutler-Hammer products. \[See ECF No. 384 p.2\]. Watson testified that he…

  10. Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · July 7, 2023 · in the opinion

    Williams v. Schneider Electric USA, Inc. (2023)

    …CORPORATION. Palmer G. Vance II, Todd S. Page, Lexington, Kentucky, BRIEFS AND ORAL ARGUMENT FOR APPELLEE/CROSS- APPELLANT SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC, USA, INC, F/K/A SQUARE D COMPANY: BEFORE: THOMPSON, CHIEF JUDGE; COMBS AND JONES, JUDGES.…

  11. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · August 28, 2024 · in the opinion

    Day v. 3M Company Inc. (2024)

    …Court with two motions to decide. The remaining defendants are: (1) Ford Motor Company (hereinafter Ford), see Ford's Summ. J. Mem. and (2) Graybar Electric Company, Inc. (hereinafter Graybar), see Graybar's Summ. J. Mem…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion

    Brock v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)

    …the insulation at the RJ Reynolds plant," he answered that he did not "recall exactly who was working" and testified only that Daniel employees were general contractors who "did all kind of different jobs." (ECF No…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania · June 6, 2023 · in the opinion

    Gorton v. Warren Pumps, LLC (2023)

    …Gorton recalled being present while machinist mates worked on pumps "in general," but did not have a specific recollection about the kinds of pumps on which those machinist mates worked or the manufacturers of the pumps…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania · October 13, 2022 · in the opinion

    Gorton v. Eaton Corporation (2022)

    …causing his mesothelioma and death. Mrs. Gorton adduced evidence sufficient for a reasonable jury to find: — Cutler-Hammer manufactured and sold electrical equipment, some of which may have incorporated asbestos-containing components, from the 1930s through…

  15. Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 17, 2020 · in the opinion

    Conaway v. ABB (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)

    …the state of Florida. ABB further argues that they are not incorporated in New York and do not maintain their principal place of business here, thus there is no general jurisdiction. Furthermore, ABB contends that Plaintiffs…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · June 24, 2024 · in the opinion

    Marcus v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2024)

    …causation standard, and then arguing that the second "substantial factor" prong is not met). Only in its reply does Eaton raise doubts about Plaintiff's actual bystander exposure to its asbestos-containing electrical products. Dkt. No…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 30, 2023 · in the opinion

    Elorreaga v. Rockwell Automation, Inc. (2023)

    …reliability, the Court "assess\[es\] the \[expert's\] reasoning or methodology, using as appropriate such criteria as testability, publication in peer reviewed literature, and general acceptance." Id. at 564. III. DISCUSSION As an initial matter, the…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · April 15, 2021 · in the opinion

    Reed v. Reichhold Liquidation, Inc. (2021)

    …Iowa State Bar Association indicate that a "harm is within the scope of a defendant's liability if that harm arises from the same general types of danger that the defendant should have taken reasonable steps…