No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

76 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 4

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · August 26, 2022 · in the opinion

    Becnel v. Lamorak Insurance Co. (2022)

    …or supplying an asbestos-containing product. Nonetheless, plaintiffs argue that General Electric can be held liable for its failure to warn of the dangers associated with asbestos insulation. According to plaintiffs, defendant was aware that asbestos…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 30, 2021

    Pizarro v. National Steel and Shipbuilding Company (2021)

    Renato Pizarro and his wife sued NASSCO, Pep Boys and other companies, alleging his mesothelioma came from asbestos exposure. The opinion describes two sources. One was the Navy overhaul of the USS Bristol County, where plaintiffs say NASSCO removed…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · November 9, 2021

    Data v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)

    Darlene Data sued many companies in her own right and as executrix of her husband Michael Data's estate. Mr. Data served in the Navy aboard the USS Newport News from 1969 to 1973. He later worked at Mesta Machine and then at the West Pittsburgh…

  4. Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 13, 2022 · in the opinion

    Barbarino v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2022)

    …ORION BUS INDUSTRIES, ONTARIO BUS INDUSTRIES AND BUS INDUSTRIES OF AMERICA), EATON CORP., GENERAL AUTOMOTIVE CORP. (INDIVIDUALLY, DOING BUSINESS AS AN AS SUCCESSOR TO FLXIBLE CO.), GENERAL ELECTRIC CO., GEORGIA-PACIFIC LLC, GILLIG CORP., GKN ROCKFORD…

  5. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · March 11, 2024 · in the opinion

    Olson v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2024)

    …INC.; FRYER-KNOWLES INC. a Washington corporation; GARDNER DENVER, INC.; GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.; GENERAL REFRACTORIES CO.; THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO., individually and as successor-in-interest to THE DURABLA MFG. CO.; GOULDS PUMPS, INC.; HARBISON…

  6. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 17, 2024 · in the opinion

    Silviano v. AO Smith Water Prods. Co. (2024)

    …HOLDINGS, INC., FORMERLY KNOWN AS DUNHAM-BUSH, INC., FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C., GARDNER DENVER, INC., GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, GOULDS PUMPS LLC, GRINNELL LLC, HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., F/K/A ALLIED SIGNAL, INC./BENDIX, IMO INDUSTRIES…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · August 26, 2022 · in the opinion

    Becnel v. Lamorak Insurance Co. (2022)

    …of America, Inc. (Rec. Doc. 739), Foster-Wheeler LLC (Rec. Docs. 693, 726, 730), General Electric Company (Rec. Docs. 702, 705), and ViacomCBS Inc. (Rec. Docs. 727, 729), plaintiffs' respective oppositions to each motion (Rec. Docs…

  8. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 23, 2023 · in the opinion

    Sides v. Advance Auto Parts Inc. (2023)

    …LLC, FEDERAL MOGUL ASBESTOS PERSONAL INJURY TRUST AS A SUCCESSOR TO FELT PRODUCTS MFG. CO., FERRARI NORTH AMERICA INC., FORD MOTOR COMPANY, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, GENUINE PARTS COMPANY, TRADING AS NAPA AUTO PARTS, HENNESSY INDUSTRIES, INC…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · January 18, 2021 · in the opinion

    Erhardt v. Bmw OF North America, LLC (2021)

    …Answer, ECF No. 68 (Aug. 21, 2018). On August 22, 2018, General Electric Co. filed an Answer with affirmative defenses and cross-claims against all Defendants. Answer, ECF No. 70 (Aug. 22, 2018). On August 30…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 25, 2021 · in the opinion

    Putt v. Ford Motor Co. (In re Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2021)

    …CBS Corporation; Certain-Teed Corporation; Crown Cork & Seal Company; Forest River, Inc.; Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation; General Electric Company; Genuine Parts Company; Industrial Holdings Corporation; Ingersoll-Rand Company; John Crane Inc.; Kelly Moore Paint Company, Inc…

  11. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · August 28, 2024 · in the opinion

    Day v. 3M Company Inc. (2024)

    …Court with two motions to decide. The remaining defendants are: (1) Ford Motor Company (hereinafter Ford), see Ford's Summ. J. Mem. and (2) Graybar Electric Company, Inc. (hereinafter Graybar), see Graybar's Summ. J. Mem…

  12. Court case · Iowa Court of Appeals · August 31, 2022 · in the opinion

    Fankhauser v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2022)

    …K/A NAPA; BORGWARNER MORSE TEC LLC; WESTROCK MWV LLC; MIDWEST WHEEL COMPANIES, INC.; NAVISTAR, INC.; MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL CORPORATION; O'HALLORAN INTERNATIONAL, INC.; LESEY HAYES COMPANY; FORD MOTOR COMPANY; UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION; DEERE & COMPANY; WESTROCK…

  13. Court case · Iowa Court of Appeals · September 21, 2022 · in the opinion

    Fankhauser v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2022)

    …K/A NAPA; BORGWARNER MORSE TEC LLC; WESTROCK MWV LLC; MIDWEST WHEEL COMPANIES, INC.; NAVISTAR, INC.; MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL CORPORATION; O'HALLORAN INTERNATIONAL, INC.; LESEY HAYES COMPANY; FORD MOTOR COMPANY; UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION; DEERE & COMPANY; WESTROCK…

  14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 29, 2024 · in the opinion

    Watts v. Pneumo Abex, LLC (2024)

    …of Review We discussed the long-established law governing directed verdicts in North Counties Engineering, Inc. v. State Farm General Ins. Co. (2014) 224 Cal.App.4th 902, 920 \[169 Cal.Rptr.3d 726\] (North Counties)…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · April 28, 2022 · in the opinion

    Smeal v. Clark Equipment Company (2022)

    …For the following reasons, I will deny both Motions for Summary Judgment. I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND For purposes of general background, the following facts are derived from the evidence submitted by the parties. Where there is conflicting…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · June 24, 2024 · in the opinion

    Marcus v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2024)

    …causation standard, and then arguing that the second "substantial factor" prong is not met). Only in its reply does Eaton raise doubts about Plaintiff's actual bystander exposure to its asbestos-containing electrical products. Dkt. No…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maine · September 16, 2020 · in the opinion

    Coffin v. Ametek, Inc. (2020)

    …86-89). For the reasons set forth below, I DENY these motions. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Victor Coffin served as an aviation electrician in the U.S. Navy from January 1968 to September 1971, as a machinist for…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky · September 30, 2021 · in the opinion

    Papineau v. Brake Supply Company, Inc. (2021)

    …the equipment's wheel, Mr. Papineau would remove the brake drum, clean it with compressed air and an electric grinder, and then remove the brake shoe using a hammer or hydraulics. Id. at 58:3-15…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · June 28, 2021

    Klick v. Asbestos Corporation, Ltd. (2021)

    The court granted Boeing's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, finding no general or specific jurisdiction over Boeing in New Jersey, denied jurisdictional discovery, and declined to transfer the claims, so Boeing won…

  20. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 6, 2020

    Koenig v. Pneumo Abex (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)

    …it, and denied the plaintiffs' cross-motion for jurisdictional discovery. New York courts lacked general or specific personal jurisdiction over a non-New York defendant where the plaintiff's exposure and injury occurred in Massachusetts, and…