7 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · January 26, 2022 · in the opinion
Barkley v. 4520 Corp., Inc. (2022)
…has held that a plaintiff must "prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product containing asbestos in order to hold \[the defendant\] liable." Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 29, 2023 · in the opinion
Ragusa v. Louisiana Guaranty Insurance Association (2023)
…When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · May 27, 2022 · in the opinion
Hilster v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2022)
…Aurora Pump Co., 2004 WL 2222935, at [\1] (Conn. Super. Sept. 14, 2004) (quoting Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 726 F. Supp. 172, 174 (W.D. Mich. 1989)). "The plaintiff must produce evidence sufficient to…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · April 4, 2022 · in the opinion
Cortez v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2022)
…same result in an analogous case, Greene v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 682 F. Supp. 304, 306 (M.D. La. 1988). In Greene, plaintiff had worked as an insulator for defendant Owens-Corning. Id. at 305…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 4, 2021 · in the opinion
Swanson v. The Marley-Wylain Co. (2021)
…than one proximate cause of an injury" such that multiple "causes frequently operate concurrently so that \[they\] constitute a direct proximate cause of the resulting harm." (Allen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1997) 225 Mich.App…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · January 23, 2023 · in the opinion
McDERMID v. 3M Company (2023)
…J. 401, 416 (2019). "The issues of whether a defendant owes a legal duty to another and the scope of that duty are generally questions of law for the court to decide." Robinson, 217 N.J…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · August 9, 2021 · in the opinion
Paroni EX rel. Estate OF Paroni v. General Electric UK Holdings Ltd. (2021)
…repeated references to the fact that GEUKH "has \no employees, no revenues,'" that GE "owns 100% of \[GEUKH's\] share capital," and that GE and GEUKH are "one corporate entity." Pl. Opp'n at 5. Accordingly…