11 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 17, 2023 · in the opinion
Crossland v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc. (2023)
…When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 19, 2020 · in the opinion
Mata v. Liberty Utilities (park Water) Corp. (2020)
…2019) 37 Cal.App.5th 292, 332.) III. Section 3294 Punitive damages serve the dual public purposes of punishment and deterrence. (Stevens v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996) 49 Cal.App.4th 1645, 1658; see § 3294…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · January 27, 2021 · in the opinion
Smith v. Schlage Lock Company, LLC (2021)
…1985) ("We agree ... that at trial plaintiff's evidence must demonstrate that he was actually exposed to the alleged offending products."); see also Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. & Amchem Prods., Inc., 69 F.3d 712…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 22, 2024 · in the opinion
Williams v. JM Manufacturing Company, Inc. (2024)
…to adequately warn of those potential risks, and that the lack of sufficient warning was a substantial factor in causing Cornelius's harm. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 1002, 993…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 17, 2024 · in the opinion
Constantine v. Lenox Instrument Co., Inc. (2024)
…exposure. See Andaloro v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc., 799 A.2d 71, 86 (Pa. Super. 2002) (quoting Coward v. Owens-Corning, 729 A.2d 614, 622-23 (Pa. Super. 1999)); Fisher v. J.A. Sexauer, 53…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · January 23, 2023 · in the opinion
McDERMID v. 3M Company (2023)
…J. 401, 416 (2019). "The issues of whether a defendant owes a legal duty to another and the scope of that duty are generally questions of law for the court to decide." Robinson, 217 N.J…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 27, 2021 · in the opinion
Morgan v. JM Manufacturing Co., Inc. (2021)
…MM's arguments in turn. A. Morgan's Exposure to J-MM Asbestos-cement Pipe Our Supreme Court examined causation in asbestos cases in depth in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · March 6, 2025
Kirby v. David Fabricators OF NY, Inc. (2025)
…restaurants from the 1960s to the 1980s and alleges he developed mesothelioma from asbestos coming from transite stone boards that the defendant supplied and that were associated with pizza ovens made by Bakers Pride Oven Company…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 9, 2020 · in the opinion
Hart v. Keenan Properties, Inc. (2020)
…at p. 551 \["any reasonable charges for treatment the injured person has paid or, having incurred, still owes the medical provider are recoverable as economic damages"\].) As explained in Pebley v. Santa Clara Organics, LLC, supra…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maine · January 25, 2021 · in the opinion
Coffin v. Ametek, Inc. (2021)
…45 U.S.C. § 51. Under FELA, a railroad owes its "employees a nondelegable duty to use reasonable care in furnishing them with a safe place to work." Dykes v. BNSF Ry. Co., 356 F. Supp…
-
Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · March 10, 2022 · in the opinion
Sinyard v. Georgia Power Company (2022)
…a \contractor' can be a statutory employer."). So, a company is not a statutory employer if it merely owns (or is in possession and control of) the premises where an employee is injured. Manning, 252 Ga…