No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

25 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · December 7, 2021 · in the opinion

    Jones v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2021)

    …of two or more persons for the purpose of accomplishing by concerted action either an unlawful purpose or a lawful purpose by unlawful means." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 188 Ill…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 25, 2022 · in the opinion

    Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)

    …in a manner that could not reasonably be foreseen by the defendant" bars recovery where such misuse proximately caused the injury. Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712, 721 n.14 (4th Cir…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 25, 2021 · in the opinion

    Putt v. Ford Motor Co. (In re Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2021)

    …does not equal absolute liability. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 994.) Because all Ford offered the jury was a "vague impression that \[the\] other products \[were\] somewhat similar," because Ford…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · December 6, 2021 · in the opinion

    Settlemyer v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, LLC (2021)

    …has held that a plaintiff must "prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product containing asbestos in order to hold \[the defendant\] liable." Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 1, 2022 · in the opinion

    Labarre v. Bienville Auto Parts Inc. (2022)

    …When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky · September 30, 2021 · in the opinion

    Papineau v. Brake Supply Company, Inc. (2021)

    …supported by evidence that the defendant acted with "flagrant indifference" or "engaged in misrepresentation, deceit or concealment of a known fact with the intention of causing injury" to the plaintiff. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Golightly…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · August 26, 2022 · in the opinion

    Becnel v. Lamorak Insurance Co. (2022)

    …1986); see also Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 2004-1589 (La. App. 1 Cir. 9/23/05), 923 So. 2d 118, writ denied sub nom. Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 2005-2318 (La. 3…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · August 26, 2022 · in the opinion

    Becnel v. Lamorak Insurance Co. (2022)

    …1986); see also Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 2004-1589 (La. App. 1 Cir. 9/23/05), 923 So. 2d 118, writ denied sub nom. Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 2005-2318 (La. 3…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · October 25, 2022 · in the opinion

    Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)

    …evidence of exposure to a specific product on a regular basis over some extended period of time in proximity to where the plaintiff actually worked.'" (quoting Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 30, 2024 · in the opinion

    Brooks v. Mission Stucco Company (2024)

    …presented to the jury." (Saller, supra, 187 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1231-1232; Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995; Barker v. Lull Engineering Co. (1978) 20 Cal.3d 413…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · November 9, 2021 · in the opinion

    Data v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)

    …of such a nature as to raise a reasonable inference that \[s\]he inhaled asbestos fibers that emanated from it.'" Wilson, 807 A.2d at 923 (quoting Coward v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 1999 Pa. Super…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 25, 2022 · in the opinion

    Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)

    …nature upon which a jury can make the necessary inference that there is a causal connection between a defendant's action and a plaintiff's injury." Prekler v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 60 F.3d 824…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 29, 2024 · in the opinion

    Watts v. Pneumo Abex, LLC (2024)

    …no evidence of sufficient sustainability to support the claim or defense of the party opposing the motion...." (Howard v. Owens Corning (1999) 72 Cal.App.4th 621, 629-630 \[85 Cal.Rptr.2d 386\].) "On appeal…

  14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 13, 2021 · in the opinion

    Vanni v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2021)

    …reasonable inference and resolving conflicts in support of the judgment. (Howard v. Owens Corning (1999) 72 Cal.App.4th 621, 630). In an asbestos-related injury case, causation involves two elements: exposure and substantial factor causation…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maine · September 16, 2020 · in the opinion

    Coffin v. Ametek, Inc. (2020)

    …a specific product on a regular basis over some extended period of time in proximity to where the plaintiff actually worked.'" Id. (quoting Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156, 1162-63 (4th Cir…

  16. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · April 11, 2023 · in the opinion

    Jordonek v. Hennessy Indus. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2023)

    …Inc.\[1\] In Richards, the Supreme Court wrote: Our starting point to answer the Ohio law question is the Fourth Circuit's decision in Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp. In Lohrmann, the plaintiff argued that a…

  17. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · August 28, 2024 · in the opinion

    Day v. 3M Company Inc. (2024)

    …2003). Ultimately, "a jury is free to accept or to reject expert testimony in whole or in part or to accord it what probative value the jury deems appropriate." Owens v. Silvia, 838 A.2d 881…

  18. Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · August 2, 2023 · in the opinion

    Smith v. Carlisle Industrial Brake & Friction, Inc. (2023)

    …at summary judgment the evidence must be considered in a light most favorable to the nonmoving party and all competing inferences must be drawn in favor of the nonmoving party); see also Owens v. Publix Supermarkets…

  19. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · July 8, 2021 · in the opinion

    Coogan v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec Inc. (2021)

    …Accordingly, we reverse the Court of Appeals in part and reinstate the jury's verdict in full. WE CONCUR: González, C.J. Johnson, J. Madsen, J. Owens, J. Gordon McCloud, J. Yu, J. Montoya-Lewis, J…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 26, 2021 · in the opinion

    Toy v. Honeywell Int'l (In re Asbestos, 2021)

    …ago. See, e.g., Brodkin Report at 64. Defendant first cites to the California Supreme Court's opinion in Rutherford v. Owens Illinois, Inc., regarding the proof of causation required in asbestos-related cases. 16 Cal…