7 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · April 27, 2021 · in the opinion
Connor v. Covil Corporation (2021)
…For instance, Appellant cites Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas, where we affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs on the issue of causation. See 69 F.3d at 716…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · June 22, 2021 · in the opinion
Staubs v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (2021)
…. . to recognize the separate disease rule" in toxic exposure cases); Sopha v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 601 N.W.2d 627, 630, 642 (Wis. 1999) (holding that "a person who brings an action based on a…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maine · September 16, 2020 · in the opinion
Coffin v. Ametek, Inc. (2020)
…a specific product on a regular basis over some extended period of time in proximity to where the plaintiff actually worked.'" Id. (quoting Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156, 1162-63 (4th Cir…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · December 2, 2022 · in the opinion
Nuckols v. Consol. Rail Corp. (2022)
…nevertheless, that there existed factual disputes regarding when plaintiff first had a duty to investigate whether his exposure to diesel exhaust may have been a cause of his cancers. See also Owens v. Union Pacific RR…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 25, 2022 · in the opinion
Hahn v. New York Air Brake LLC (2022)
…cause of action against a manufacturer for asbestos-related latent injuries, a plaintiff must "establish some threshold exposure to the defendant's defective asbestos-containing products." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · February 22, 2021 · in the opinion
Jack v. Dco, LLC (2021)
…position. See Keller v. City of Spokane, 44 P.3d 845, 848 (Wash. 2002) (en banc) ("a court must decide not only who owes the duty, but also to whom the duty is owed. . . ."). Here, the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maine · January 25, 2021 · in the opinion
Coffin v. Ametek, Inc. (2021)
…45 U.S.C. § 51. Under FELA, a railroad owes its "employees a nondelegable duty to use reasonable care in furnishing them with a safe place to work." Dykes v. BNSF Ry. Co., 356 F. Supp…