39 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 1 of 2
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 21, 2021 · in the opinion
Ann Strobel v. Johnson & Johnson (2021)
…25 Cal.4th at p. 850), which here is the preponderance of the evidence (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 965 (Rutherford)). "\On appeal "\[w\]e review a grant of summary judgment…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 23, 2022 · in the opinion
Bader v. Johnson & Johnson (2022)
…with negligence, product liability, and concealment instructions that incorporated the asbestos-specific standard of proof for causation set forth in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 \[67 Cal.Rptr.2d 16, 941…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 19, 2021 · in the opinion
Toy v. Armstrong Int'l (In re Asbestos, 2021)
…Dkt. No. 418 at 5. But Plaintiffs bear the burden of establishing that exposure to Defendants' products was a substantial factor causing his illness. See Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal. 4th 953, 982 (Cal…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · August 3, 2021 · in the opinion
Viale v. Foster Wheeler, LLC (2021)
…a triable issue of fact that Ronald was exposed to asbestos-containing Foster Wheeler products and therefore that exposure was a "substantial factor" causing Ronald's mesothelioma. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 941 P.2d 1203…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 25, 2021 · in the opinion
Putt v. Ford Motor Co. (In re Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2021)
…subd. (a); Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 958 (Rutherford).) "\[I\]f supported by the evidence," a jury must apportion fault against parties and nonparties found responsible for the plaintiff's injury…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 22, 2020 · in the opinion
Gibbons v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer (Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2020)
…was a substantial factor causing the illness by showing that in reasonable medical probability it was a substantial factor contributing to the plaintiff's or decedent's risk of developing cancer." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 5, 2021 · in the opinion
Leavitt v. Johnson & Johnson (2021)
…prejudicial error and affirm. BACKGROUND A. A plaintiff seeking to hold a manufacturer liable for asbestos-related latent injuries must satisfy a two-part causation test. (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · October 1, 2021 · in the opinion
Dietrich v. Boeing Company (2021)
…successor in interest to Mason-Neilan Regulator Company and Annin Valve Co.; METALCLAD INSULATION LLC, FKA Metalclad Insulation Corporation; OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., individually and as successor in interest to Owens-Illinois Glass Company; SOCO WEST, INC.…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 21, 2021 · in the opinion
Benavidez v. Fluor Corp. (2021)
…a particular exposure or series of exposures was a \legal cause' of his injury, i.e., a substantial factor in bringing about the injury." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 982-983…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 13, 2021 · in the opinion
Vanni v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2021)
…factor in contributing to the aggregate dose of asbestos the plaintiff or decedent inhaled or ingested, and hence to the risk of developing asbestos-related cancer." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 26, 2021 · in the opinion
Toy v. Honeywell Int'l (In re Asbestos, 2021)
…ago. See, e.g., Brodkin Report at 64. Defendant first cites to the California Supreme Court's opinion in Rutherford v. Owens Illinois, Inc., regarding the proof of causation required in asbestos-related cases. 16 Cal…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 11, 2020 · in the opinion
Booker v. Imerys Talc America, Inc. (2020)
…particular exposure or series of exposures was a \legal cause' of his injury, i.e., a substantial factor in bringing about the injury." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 982-983 (Rutherford)…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 31, 2023 · in the opinion
Elorreaga v. Rockwell Automation, Inc. (2023)
…CV-00325-HSG, 2021 WL 1167638, at [\5] (N.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2021) (quoting Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal. 4th 953, 958, 67 Cal.Rptr.2d 16, 941 P.2d 1203 (Cal. 1997)…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · May 20, 2021 · in the opinion
Toy v. Armstrong Int'l (In re Toy Asbestos, 2021)
…exposed to asbestos from Defendant's products; and (2) this exposure was a substantial factor in causing Mr. Toy's injury and death. See Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal. 4th 953, 968-69 (Cal…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · April 5, 2024 · in the opinion
Speck v. CBS Corporation (2024)
…both that he was actually exposed to asbestos-containing materials that were installed by the \[defendants\] and that such exposure was a substantial contributing factor in causing his injuries"); Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 18, 2021 · in the opinion
Phipps v. Copeland Corporation LLC (2021)
…was a substantial factor causing the illness by showing that in reasonable medical probability it was a substantial factor contributing to the plaintiff's or decedent's risk of developing cancer." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 30, 2023 · in the opinion
Elorreaga v. Rockwell Automation, Inc. (2023)
…long latency period of asbestos-related disease, and the occupational settings that commonly exposed the worker to multiple forms and brands of asbestos products with varying degrees of toxicity." Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 24, 2021 · in the opinion
Sabetian v. Fluor Enterprises, Inc. (2021)
…particular product was a legal cause of a plaintiff's injury, the plaintiff must satisfy the two-part test enunciated by the Supreme Court in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford)…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 27, 2021 · in the opinion
Morgan v. JM Manufacturing Co., Inc. (2021)
…MM's arguments in turn. A. Morgan's Exposure to J-MM Asbestos-cement Pipe Our Supreme Court examined causation in asbestos cases in depth in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 24, 2020 · in the opinion
Collantes v. Elementis Chemicals, Inc. (2020)
…a particular exposure or series of exposures was a \legal cause' of his injury, i.e., a substantial factor in bringing about the injury." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 982-983…