No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

22 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · June 27, 2022 · in the opinion

    Bantin v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2022)

    …S. Inchon, Mr. Bantin served as an instructor at a correctional facility located in Great Lakes, Illinois until he was honorably discharged from the U.S. Navy in May of 1974. \[Bantin Trial Dep., Doc. 107…

  2. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · January 27, 2021 · in the opinion

    Smith v. Schlage Lock Company, LLC (2021)

    …Catherine Basque Weiler, SWANSON, MARTIN & BELL, LLP, Chicago, Illinois, for Appellee. Before AGEE, WYNN, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by published PER CURIAM opinion. [\484] PER CURIAM: In 2016, Julian Jackson Smith was diagnosed with mesothelioma…

  3. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of North Carolina · November 16, 2021 · in the opinion

    In re Ltl Management LLC (2021)

    …of Old JJCI's liabilities arising from talc-related claims. Among the limited assets the Debtor owns are a bank account containing approximately $6 million in cash, Old JJCI's rights as payee under a funding…

  4. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · April 29, 2024 · in the opinion

    In re Bestwall, LLC (2024)

    …Rogers, Diana Johnson, WALDREP WALL BABCOCK & BAILEY PLLC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellants. Gregory M. Gordon, Dallas, Texas, Megan Lacy Owen, JONES DAY, Washington, D.C.; Garland S. Cassada, Richard C. Worf, Jr., Charlotte, North…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 25, 2022 · in the opinion

    Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)

    …in a manner that could not reasonably be foreseen by the defendant" bars recovery where such misuse proximately caused the injury. Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712, 721 n.14 (4th Cir…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · January 26, 2022 · in the opinion

    Barkley v. 4520 Corp., Inc. (2022)

    …has held that a plaintiff must "prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product containing asbestos in order to hold \[the defendant\] liable." Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · March 23, 2021 · in the opinion

    McDaniel v. John Crane, Inc. (2021)

    …On August 18, 1972, Defendant wrote to Duke Power to confirm that Covil would use "Owens Corning Asbestos Free Calcium Silicate Pipe Covering and Block for the ducts, feed water heaters, and piping where Thermobestos was…

  8. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · April 27, 2021 · in the opinion

    Connor v. Covil Corporation (2021)

    …For instance, Appellant cites Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas, where we affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs on the issue of causation. See 69 F.3d at 716…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · May 21, 2020 · in the opinion

    Woolard v. Carrier Corporation (2020)

    …plaintiff "\must prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product' containing asbestos in order to hold the manufacturer of that product liable." See Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · December 6, 2021 · in the opinion

    Settlemyer v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, LLC (2021)

    …has held that a plaintiff must "prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product containing asbestos in order to hold \[the defendant\] liable." Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · March 22, 2021 · in the opinion

    McDaniel v. John Crane, Inc. (2021)

    …must present \evidence of exposure to a specific product on a regular basis over some extended period of time in proximity to where the plaintiff worked.'" Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · May 18, 2020 · in the opinion

    Whitehead v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2020)

    …plaintiff "\must prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product' containing asbestos in order to hold the manufacturer of that product liable." See Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · March 21, 2024 · in the opinion

    Pike v. Dempster Industries, Inc. (2024)

    …plaintiff "\must prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product' containing asbestos in order to hold the manufacturer of that product liable." See Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · October 25, 2022 · in the opinion

    Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)

    …evidence of exposure to a specific product on a regular basis over some extended period of time in proximity to where the plaintiff actually worked.'" (quoting Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion

    Vinson v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2021)

    …plaintiff "\must prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product' containing asbestos in order to hold the manufacturer of that product liable." See Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion

    Brock v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)

    …plaintiff "\must prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product' containing asbestos in order to hold the manufacturer of that product liable." See Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 25, 2022 · in the opinion

    Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)

    …nature upon which a jury can make the necessary inference that there is a causal connection between a defendant's action and a plaintiff's injury." Prekler v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 60 F.3d 824…

  18. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of North Carolina · December 28, 2023 · in the opinion

    In re Aldrich Pump LLC (2023)

    …Trust. Meanwhile, each Debtor owns an operating subsidiary and has a business of sorts—managing the tens of thousands of asbestos litigation claims against them. See Declaration of Allen Tananbaum in support of Debtor's Objection.…

  19. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of North Carolina · August 10, 2021 · in the opinion

    In re Dbmp LLC (2021)

    …Debtor's cash flow is insufficient, New CertainTeed is required to provide DBMP with the funds that DBMP would then use to pay any indemnity it allegedly owes to New CertainTeed, on the effective date of…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 28, 2020 · in the opinion

    Brock v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2020)

    …of: (1) "whether the defendant maintains offices or agents in the forum state"; (2) "whether the defendant owns property in the forum state"; (3) "whether the defendant reached into the forum state to solicit or initiate…