12 results for “Owens-Illinois”
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · February 22, 2022 · in the opinion
Budd v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. (2022)
…compound. Given the differences between smoking an addictive substance and using a particular product in the course of employment, we reject this contention. See Raney v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 897 F.2d 94, 96 (2d Cir…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · July 22, 2021 · in the opinion
Kraemer v. Lone Star Industries (2021)
…military contactor defense. The plaintiffs introduced significant evidence below that the insulation sold by Fibreboard and Owens-Illinois to the Navy was the very same insulation which those companies marketed to commercial buyers. This insulation was…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · August 1, 2022
Carroll v. Akebono Brake Corporation (2022)
…order striking Marjorie Carroll's complaint against Nissan as a discovery sanction and remanded, and affirmed the $1,000 fee sanction against attorney Owens, rejecting Nissan's cross-appeal. A court may strike a complaint as…
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · August 3, 2023 · in the opinion
Wright v. 3M Co. (2023)
…We affirm the Court of Appeals and remand to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with the opinions on appeal. WE CONCUR: González, C.J. Johnson, J. Owens, J. Stephens, J. Montoya-Lewis, J. Whitener…
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · July 8, 2021 · in the opinion
Coogan v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec Inc. (2021)
…Accordingly, we reverse the Court of Appeals in part and reinstate the jury's verdict in full. WE CONCUR: González, C.J. Johnson, J. Madsen, J. Owens, J. Gordon McCloud, J. Yu, J. Montoya-Lewis, J…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · March 9, 2023 · in the opinion
Deem v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2023)
…with maritime law, is that the plaintiff show "more than a casual or minimum contact with the product" to hold the defendant liable. Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. & Amchem Prod., 69 F.3d 712, 716 …
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · January 24, 2023
Buckholtz v. American Optical Corporation (2023)
…it remanded to vacate the judgment against Zidell Explorations and for a new trial. A company that owns a ship being dismantled and retains the right to control the work can owe a duty to the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · August 5, 2021
Wineland v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)
…factor, with evidence of the amount and duration of exposure. A manufacturer owes a duty to warn about third-party replacement parts only if its product requires the part to function as intended. Causation; Product Identification…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · February 22, 2021 · in the opinion
Jack v. Dco, LLC (2021)
…position. See Keller v. City of Spokane, 44 P.3d 845, 848 (Wash. 2002) (en banc) ("a court must decide not only who owes the duty, but also to whom the duty is owed. . . ."). Here, the…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · September 16, 2024 · in the opinion
Sorrentino v. Ammco Tools, Inc. (2024)
…industry custom or feasibility of design can be considered when the plaintiff opens the door by "present\[ing\] evidence that puts in issue the custom of the industry or feasibility of alternative design" as "the defendant…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · January 12, 2022 · in the opinion
United States Fidelity & Guaranty v. Ulbricht (2022)
…USF&G, Defendants contend, "has thus far refused to pay anything towards the accrued interest" and therefore "owes at least $171,172.60" in interest on the $4.5 million covenant judgment. (Id.) However, the record…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · December 13, 2021 · in the opinion
Wright v. 3M Company (2021)
…landowner's premises. Id. The parties do not dispute Wright's status as an invitee. A landowner owes an invitee the duty of care set forth in the Restatement (Second) of Torts § 343 (Am Law Inst.