7 results for “Owens-Illinois”
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · January 23, 2023 · in the opinion
McDERMID v. 3M Company (2023)
…jurisprudence recognizes \foreseeability as a determinant of a \[defendant's\] duty of care ... \[and\] of whether a breach of duty is a proximate cause of an ultimate injury.'" Olivo v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 186 N.J…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 4, 2021 · in the opinion
Swanson v. The Marley-Wylain Co. (2021)
…series of exposures was a \legal cause' of his injury, i.e., a substantial factor in bringing about the injury." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 982 \[67 Cal.Rptr.2d 16…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · January 26, 2022 · in the opinion
Barkley v. 4520 Corp., Inc. (2022)
…has held that a plaintiff must "prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product containing asbestos in order to hold \[the defendant\] liable." Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 29, 2023 · in the opinion
Ragusa v. Louisiana Guaranty Insurance Association (2023)
…When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · May 27, 2022 · in the opinion
Hilster v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2022)
…Aurora Pump Co., 2004 WL 2222935, at [\1] (Conn. Super. Sept. 14, 2004) (quoting Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 726 F. Supp. 172, 174 (W.D. Mich. 1989)). "The plaintiff must produce evidence sufficient to…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · April 4, 2022 · in the opinion
Cortez v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2022)
…not arise out of the employee-employer relationship of plaintiff and defendant; Owens-Corning under these circumstances is essentially a third party manufacturer outside of the plaintiff's employment relationship with another company." Id. at 306…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · August 9, 2021 · in the opinion
Paroni EX rel. Estate OF Paroni v. General Electric UK Holdings Ltd. (2021)
…repeated references to the fact that GEUKH "has \no employees, no revenues,'" that GE "owns 100% of \[GEUKH's\] share capital," and that GE and GEUKH are "one corporate entity." Pl. Opp'n at 5. Accordingly…