22 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 1 of 2
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 4, 2020
Gaddy v. Taylor Seidenbach, Inc. (2020)
…Owens-Illinois was liable for Dr. Gaddy's asbestos exposure at International Paper. A jury verdict may be set aside under Rule 50(b) only if no reasonable jury could have found otherwise. Testimony that Owens…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · December 14, 2020
Adams v. Ethyl Corporation (2020)
…general damages to $3,000,000, and rejected both Ethyl's challenges and the plaintiffs' challenge to the jury's allocation of fault to Owens-Illinois. Under Louisiana article 2317, a premises condition is a defect…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 4, 2020
Gaddy v. Taylor Seidenbach, Inc. (2020)
Dr. James Gaddy, a chemical engineer, developed mesothelioma and died about six months after diagnosis. His children sued Ethyl Corporation and others, alleging he was exposed to asbestos at International Paper and at Ethyl's Baton Rouge plant from…
-
Court case · Utah Supreme Court · November 18, 2021 · in the opinion
Boynton v. Kennecott Utah Copper, LLC (2021)
…the plaintiff\] worked, should have foreseen that whoever performed that task would come into contact with the asbestos that infiltrated his clothing while he performed his contracted tasks. Olivo v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 186 N.J…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · August 3, 2021 · in the opinion
Viale v. Foster Wheeler, LLC (2021)
…a triable issue of fact that Ronald was exposed to asbestos-containing Foster Wheeler products and therefore that exposure was a "substantial factor" causing Ronald's mesothelioma. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 941 P.2d 1203…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 24, 2021 · in the opinion
Sabetian v. Fluor Enterprises, Inc. (2021)
…particular product was a legal cause of a plaintiff's injury, the plaintiff must satisfy the two-part test enunciated by the Supreme Court in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford)…
-
Court case · Tennessee Supreme Court · January 4, 2021 · in the opinion
Coffman v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2021)
…statutory construction is to ascertain and give effect to the legislative intent without unduly restricting or expanding a statute's coverage beyond its intended scope." Howard, 504 S.W.3d at 269 (quoting Owens v. State…
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · August 3, 2023 · in the opinion
Wright v. 3M Co. (2023)
…We affirm the Court of Appeals and remand to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with the opinions on appeal. WE CONCUR: González, C.J. Johnson, J. Owens, J. Stephens, J. Montoya-Lewis, J. Whitener…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · February 3, 2021 · in the opinion
Steib v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2021)
…in evaluating liability in an asbestos case. Those tort theories require proof of causation—that the plaintiff was exposed to asbestos for which the defendant is responsible. Emery v. Owens-Corp., 00-2144, p. 12 (La…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 29, 2023 · in the opinion
Ragusa v. Louisiana Guaranty Insurance Association (2023)
…When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas · August 24, 2023 · in the opinion
United Refining Co. v. Dorrion (2023)
…151, 154 n. 1 (5th Cir. 2014), citing Wright v. Owens Corning, 679 F.3d 101 (3d Cir. 2012). But whether new or old law applies, it's clear that the Decedent had a dischargeable, prepetition…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas · August 23, 2023 · in the opinion
United Refining Company v. Dorrion (2023)
…In re Placid Oil Co, 753 F3d 151, 154 n 1 (5th Cir 2014), citing Wright v Owens Corning, 679 F3d 101 (3d Cir 2012). But whether new or old law applies, it's clear that…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · February 18, 2020 · in the opinion
Chevron Oronite Company, LLC v. Jacobs Field Services North America, Incorporated (2020)
…for Bourgeois's spouse and three adult children, as well as survival damages. To arrive at that figure, Jacobs relied principally on Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 878 So. 2d 631 (La. App. 1st Cir.)…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Texas · January 16, 2021 · in the opinion
In re United Refining Company (2021)
…3d Cir. 2010), but the accrual test still applies in the Third Circuit for plans confirmed before 2010. Wright v. Owens Corning, 679 F.3d 101, 109 (3d Cir. 2012).\[5\] Under the conduct test, a…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · July 28, 2022 · in the opinion
Cortez v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2022)
…Court did not create new substantive law in Halphen, but merely compiled and interpreted the law with regard to products liability in Louisiana at that time." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · April 1, 2021 · in the opinion
Lege v. Union Carbide Corporation (2021)
…Texaco, Thermotech, Dresser/Brown & Root, and Ohlson each five percent at fault; and (4) Owens-Corning Kaylo, Johnsmansville Thermobestos, UNARCO Unibestos, and Eagle-Picher 66 Insulating Mud each one percent at fault. The jury awarded total…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 20, 2021
Khosravan v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (2021)
…defendants, holding they owed no duty of care to Khosravan, and awarded respondents their costs on appeal. A defendant owes no duty to protect workers from asbestos at premises it did not own, possess or control…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 28, 2020
Sabetian v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (2020)
…favor of the Exxon defendants. A defendant that did not own, possess or control the premises owes no premises or negligence duty to workers there, and a guarantee in a contract not intended to benefit the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · January 12, 2022 · in the opinion
United States Fidelity & Guaranty v. Ulbricht (2022)
…USF&G, Defendants contend, "has thus far refused to pay anything towards the accrued interest" and therefore "owes at least $171,172.60" in interest on the $4.5 million covenant judgment. (Id.) However, the record…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas · May 25, 2022 · in the opinion
EL Paso Energy Est Company v. Chevron USA Inc. (2022)
…El Paso's defense costs in that suit. (Dkt. 41 at p. 4). "\[A\]s Chevron owes no duty to defend El Paso, it, a fortiori, has no duty to indemnify it." (Dkt. 41 at p…