No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

16 results for “Owens-Illinois”

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 21, 2021 · in the opinion

    Ann Strobel v. Johnson & Johnson (2021)

    …25 Cal.4th at p. 850), which here is the preponderance of the evidence (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 965 (Rutherford)). "\On appeal "\[w\]e review a grant of summary judgment…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 23, 2022 · in the opinion

    Bader v. Johnson & Johnson (2022)

    …with negligence, product liability, and concealment instructions that incorporated the asbestos-specific standard of proof for causation set forth in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 \[67 Cal.Rptr.2d 16, 941…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 22, 2020 · in the opinion

    Gibbons v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer (Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2020)

    …was a substantial factor causing the illness by showing that in reasonable medical probability it was a substantial factor contributing to the plaintiff's or decedent's risk of developing cancer." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 5, 2021 · in the opinion

    Leavitt v. Johnson & Johnson (2021)

    …prejudicial error and affirm. BACKGROUND A. A plaintiff seeking to hold a manufacturer liable for asbestos-related latent injuries must satisfy a two-part causation test. (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 11, 2020 · in the opinion

    Booker v. Imerys Talc America, Inc. (2020)

    …particular exposure or series of exposures was a \legal cause' of his injury, i.e., a substantial factor in bringing about the injury." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 982-983 (Rutherford)…

  6. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · June 20, 2023 · in the opinion

    Johnson v. Edward Orton, JR. Ceramic Foundation (2023)

    …The Supreme Court of Illinois "has long recognized that \every person owes a duty of ordinary care to all others to guard against injuries which naturally flow as a reasonably probable and foreseeable consequence of an…

  7. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · April 6, 2023 · in the opinion

    Taylor v. BASF Catalysts, LLC (2023)

    …exposure to liability as a distributor that supplied raw asbestos. Eventually, there were approximately 15,000 plaintiffs in Ohio and Illinois with asbestos-related claims pending against C.P. Hall. Bevan represented many of those plaintiffs. […

  8. Court case · Montana Supreme Court · March 25, 2020 · in the opinion

    Maryland Cas. Co. v. Asbestos Claims Court (2020)

    …whatever." Fackelman, 942 A.2d at 129. ¶40 During the period between 1958 and 1972 when it provided workers' compensation [\900] insurance coverage to Owens Corning, the insurer: performed various air sample surveys, industrial hygiene studies…

  9. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · February 1, 2023 · in the opinion

    Chenet v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. (2023)

    …Judge. APPEAL DISMISSED; CASE REMANDED. Lindsey A. Cheek, THE CHEEK LAW FIRM, 650 Poydras Street, Suite 2310, New Orleans, LA 70130, Lewis Owens Unglesby, Lance C. Unglesby, Adrian M. Simm, Jr., Jamie F. Gontarek, UNGLESBY LAW…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of New York · April 29, 2020 · in the opinion

    Castro v. Colgate-Palmolive Company (2020)

    …2) (B) only when the plaintiff contests, or the court questions, the defendant's allegation." Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co., LLC v. Owens, 574 U.S. 81, 89 (2014). Johnson & Johnson thus has satisfied the removal…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · April 22, 2021 · in the opinion

    Roy v. Colgate Palmolive Co. (2021)

    …Young v. Louge, 660 So. 2d 32, 49 (La. App. 4 Cir. 1995). \[28\] Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118, 123 (La. App. 1 Cir. 2005); See also Pitman v. Crane Co…

  12. Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · June 23, 2020 · in the opinion

    Ingham v. Johnson & Johnson (2020)

    …is reversed in part on the claims of the two Non-Resident Plaintiffs, Allan Koman on behalf of Annette Koman and Marcia Owens, who only used Johnson's Baby Powder and denied using Shimmer for lack…

  13. Blog · 2022

    Is there Asbestos in Imported Chinese Goods?

    …consumer goods, such as: Makeup Talcum-based products Yarn and thread Electrical heaters Toasters Hair dryers Electrical stoves and ovens Even Some Children’s Products Made in China Have Tested Positive for Asbestos Alarmingly, some Chinese…

  14. Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 14, 2020 · in the opinion

    Luca v. The Neslemur Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)

    …expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns, uses or possesses any real property situated within the state" (CPLR …

  15. Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 28, 2020 · in the opinion

    Germain v. The Neslemur Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)

    …expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns, uses or possesses any real property situated within the state" (CPLR …

  16. Court case · New York Supreme Court · October 20, 2020 · in the opinion

    English v. Avon Prods., Inc. (2020)

    …reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns or possesses any real property situated within the state. In the case at bar…