17 results for “Owens-Illinois”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · August 22, 2014 · in the opinion
Boyer v. Weyerhaeuser Company (2014)
Strict Liability Plaintiffs' strict liability claim against Owens-Illinois is similarly flawed. To impose strict liability under Wisconsin law, the defendant must be "engaged in the business" of selling the alleged defective product. Geboy v. TRL…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · June 2, 2017 · in the opinion
Landreth v. Brake Supply Company, Inc. (2017)
…causation where there are many possible sources of asbestos exposure, jurisdictions have fashioned different causation standards: "1) the California Supreme Court's \exposure-to-risk' test of Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal.4th 953…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · October 15, 2019 · in the opinion
Fullen v. 3M Company (2019)
…s Motion to Dismiss Claim for Punitive Damages, Plaintiffs stated that Lockheed had asserted the improper standard for punitive damages in a case such as this one, and then they cited to Owens-Illinois, Inc. v…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · July 15, 2016 · in the opinion
Mannahan v. Eaton Corporation (2016)
…similar products at the same time periods and worksites. Not uncommonly, plaintiffs have been unable to prove direct exposure to a given defendant's product." Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 941 P.2d 1203, 1218 (Cal…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · April 5, 2024 · in the opinion
Speck v. CBS Corporation (2024)
…both that he was actually exposed to asbestos-containing materials that were installed by the \[defendants\] and that such exposure was a substantial contributing factor in causing his injuries"); Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · June 1, 2018 · in the opinion
Kilty v. Weyerhaeuser Company (2018)
…Feb. 19, 2016), aff'd sub nom. Pecher v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 859 F.3d 396 (7th Cir. 2017) (requiring that asbestos exposure be a "substantial contributing factor" to mesothelioma diagnosis). However, none of those issues…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 13, 2019 · in the opinion
Nelson v. Holley Performance Prods. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns, uses or possesses any real property situated within the state" (CPLR …
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · October 28, 2005
Adams v. Asbestos Corp. Ltd. (2005)
…from contact with it is a covered occupational disease and workers' compensation is the exclusive remedy. Expert Testimony; Employer and Contractor Liability, and Workers' Compensation; Wrongful Death and Survival former employee of Libbey-Owens-Ford Company
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · March 15, 2007
Potts v. 3M Co. (2007)
…does not describe where or how he was exposed. It says the insulation manufacturers (Johns-Manville, Celotex/Carey and Owens Corning) had been through bankruptcy. The Edward R. Hart Company was an installer and supplier of…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · January 19, 2021 · in the opinion
Robertson v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2021)
Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that the plaintiffs showed evidence of frequent and regular exposure where they were exposed to asbestos dust on a daily basis…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · December 6, 2021 · in the opinion
Settlemyer v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, LLC (2021)
…has held that a plaintiff must "prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product containing asbestos in order to hold \[the defendant\] liable." Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · May 16, 2013 · in the opinion
Scearce v. 3M Company (2013)
…federal defense; and 4) there is a causal nexus between the claims and the conduct performed under color of a federal office. Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124, 127 (3d Cir. 1998…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · September 13, 2022 · in the opinion
Webb v. 3M Company (2022)
…That statement does not require the removing party to provide evidence. Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co., LLC v. Owens, 574 U.S. 81, 84 (2014) (reversing the Tenth Circuit for abuse of discretion in denying review…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · January 5, 2010 · in the opinion
Downs v. 3M Company (2010)
…and has favored a case-by-case balancing." Kettenbach, 822 F. Supp. at 45; see also Abbott v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 444 S.E.2d 285, 290 (W.Va. 1994) (quoting Norfolk & W. Ry. Co…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · June 5, 2018 · in the opinion
Turcotte v. 3M Company (2018)
…Dec. 13, 2017.) At some point after his diagnosis and deposition, Mr. Turcotte moved to New Hampshire, where he owns a home and continues to receive treatment in that state. (Aff. of Gerard Turcotte ¶¶ 5, 6…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · April 16, 2018 · in the opinion
Bostic v. 3M Company (2018)
…statute has "consistently been held to require complete diversity of citizenship. That is, diversity jurisdiction does not exist unless each defendant is a citizen of a different State from each plaintiff." Owen Equip. & Erection Co. v…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · December 13, 2021 · in the opinion
Wright v. 3M Company (2021)
…landowner's premises. Id. The parties do not dispute Wright's status as an invitee. A landowner owes an invitee the duty of care set forth in the Restatement (Second) of Torts § 343 (Am Law Inst.