18 results for “Owens-Illinois”
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · June 6, 2017
Pecher v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (2017)
The Seventh Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of the plaintiffs' claims against Weyerhaeuser and Owens-Illinois, and ordered plaintiffs' counsel to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed. Claims by employees whose asbestos…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · November 10, 2015
Sydow v. Weyerhaeuser Company (2015)
The court found Owens-Illinois' motion to dismiss moot, denied 3M's and Weyerhaeuser's motions to join it, and granted Theresa Sydow's motion to file a third amended complaint substituting her as special administrator…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · August 22, 2014 · in the opinion
Boyer v. Weyerhaeuser Company (2014)
Strict Liability Plaintiffs' strict liability claim against Owens-Illinois is similarly flawed. To impose strict liability under Wisconsin law, the defendant must be "engaged in the business" of selling the alleged defective product. Geboy v. TRL…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · June 8, 2018 · in the opinion
Kilty v. Weyerhaeuser Co. (2018)
…Wis. Feb. 19, 2016), aff'd Pecher v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 859 F.3d 396 (7th Cir. 2017). As was true in the first wave of asbestos cases, the plaintiffs' claims here rise or fall depending…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · May 22, 2019 · in the opinion
Lamson v. Georgia-Pacific LLC (2019)
…INC.; WEIL-MCLAIN COMPANY, INC.; OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS COMPANY AND D/B/A O-I; UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION; YORK INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · October 15, 2019 · in the opinion
Fullen v. 3M Company (2019)
…s Motion to Dismiss Claim for Punitive Damages, Plaintiffs stated that Lockheed had asserted the improper standard for punitive damages in a case such as this one, and then they cited to Owens-Illinois, Inc. v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · April 17, 2018 · in the opinion
Kilty v. Weyerhaeuser Company (2018)
…4, 2014), aff'd sub nom. Pecher v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 859 F.3d 396 (7th Cir. 2017), the court held that exposure to asbestos arising out of employment — including exposure outside of the workplace to…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · June 1, 2018 · in the opinion
Kilty v. Weyerhaeuser Company (2018)
…Feb. 19, 2016), aff'd sub nom. Pecher v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 859 F.3d 396 (7th Cir. 2017) (requiring that asbestos exposure be a "substantial contributing factor" to mesothelioma diagnosis). However, none of those issues…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 13, 2019 · in the opinion
Nelson v. Holley Performance Prods. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns, uses or possesses any real property situated within the state" (CPLR …
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · March 15, 2007
Potts v. 3M Co. (2007)
…does not describe where or how he was exposed. It says the insulation manufacturers (Johns-Manville, Celotex/Carey and Owens Corning) had been through bankruptcy. The Edward R. Hart Company was an installer and supplier of…
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · February 7, 2008 · in the opinion
Sales v. Weyerhaeuser Company (2008)
…The Boeing Company, Seattle, WA, Amicus Curiae on behalf of The Boeing Company. OWENS, J. ¶ 1 This case presents an opportunity for this court to clarify the common law doctrine of forum non conveniens. The trial…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · May 16, 2013 · in the opinion
Scearce v. 3M Company (2013)
…federal defense; and 4) there is a causal nexus between the claims and the conduct performed under color of a federal office. Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124, 127 (3d Cir. 1998…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · September 13, 2022 · in the opinion
Webb v. 3M Company (2022)
…That statement does not require the removing party to provide evidence. Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co., LLC v. Owens, 574 U.S. 81, 84 (2014) (reversing the Tenth Circuit for abuse of discretion in denying review…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · March 7, 2016 · in the opinion
Pecher v. Weyerhaeuser Company (2016)
…is disinclined to allow this evidence and argument in the liability phase, unless either side opens the door, except to explain that any liability to plaintiff for work exposure has been addressed in a separate proceeding…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · January 5, 2010 · in the opinion
Downs v. 3M Company (2010)
…and has favored a case-by-case balancing." Kettenbach, 822 F. Supp. at 45; see also Abbott v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 444 S.E.2d 285, 290 (W.Va. 1994) (quoting Norfolk & W. Ry. Co…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · June 5, 2018 · in the opinion
Turcotte v. 3M Company (2018)
…Dec. 13, 2017.) At some point after his diagnosis and deposition, Mr. Turcotte moved to New Hampshire, where he owns a home and continues to receive treatment in that state. (Aff. of Gerard Turcotte ¶¶ 5, 6…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · April 16, 2018 · in the opinion
Bostic v. 3M Company (2018)
…statute has "consistently been held to require complete diversity of citizenship. That is, diversity jurisdiction does not exist unless each defendant is a citizen of a different State from each plaintiff." Owen Equip. & Erection Co. v…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · December 13, 2021 · in the opinion
Wright v. 3M Company (2021)
…landowner's premises. Id. The parties do not dispute Wright's status as an invitee. A landowner owes an invitee the duty of care set forth in the Restatement (Second) of Torts § 343 (Am Law Inst.