6 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · September 28, 2020
Gibbs v. 84 Lumber Company (2020)
… Design Defect; Sophisticated User and Intermediary Defenses; Choice of Law Worksites: General Electric Large Steam Turbine Division; Deforest Company; home renovations with his father; General Plumbing job sites laborer, plumber, and shade tree mechanic Deforest Company…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · February 1, 2011
Cone v. Agco Corp. (2011)
…trial. It argued first that it could not be liable for engines made before 1988, when it bought assets from a General Motors division. It argued second that it made no asbestos products after 1988. The…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · May 21, 2024
Seen v. Kaiser Gypsum Co. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2024)
…suffering award that deviates materially from reasonable compensation under CPLR 5501(c) must be reduced or retried, and under General Obligations Law § 15-108 settlement amounts paid by settling defendants are deducted from the total award…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · April 7, 2011 · in the opinion
Carlson v. 84 Lumber Company (2011)
…fourth specific torts factor is not useful to this Court's choice of law analysis. 2 Application of General Interest-Weighing Factors The choice of law analysis may not always turn on the quantity of contacts…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · March 5, 2015 · in the opinion
Jones v. 84 Lumber Company (2015)
…which was to standardize and simplify the proof of laws of foreign states." Id. In 1940, the Rhode Island General Assembly enacted a revised form of the Judicial Notice of Foreign Law Act, P.L. 1940…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · October 17, 2016 · in the opinion
Jackson v. 84 Lumber Co. (2016)
…(Union Carbide, Crane) Defendant's general motion to preclude regulatory materials and public health pronouncements regarding asbestos is denied as overly broad more properly an evidentiary issue for trial. The Court will consider the admissibility of…