No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

26 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 18, 2019

    Babcock v. CBS Corp. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    The court granted defendants CBS and General Electric's motion to compel nonparty Memorial Sloan Kettering to produce Arnold Babcock's original pathology materials, denied the hospital's cross-motion for a protective order, and denied…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · February 15, 2022 · in the opinion

    Gay v. AO Smith Corporation (2022)

    Nevertheless, there are two exceptions to the general rule of nonliability—the \retained control' exception and the \peculiar risk' exception. Plaintiff argues that both exceptions apply, or at least that there are genuine disputes of material…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · June 17, 2021

    Gay v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)

    …from asbestos exposure. His work history included the Navy, the Air Force, General Electric, Stone and Webster, and automotive work. The claim against Yuba concerned his work from 1977 to 1981 on the construction of the…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · April 26, 2021

    Gay v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)

    Carl Gay developed mesothelioma, diagnosed in June 2019, and died in April 2020. His daughter, Allisa Gay, as executor of his estate, sued Gardner Denver and other manufacturers and distributors. She alleged he was exposed to asbestos in Gardner…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · April 26, 2021

    Gay v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)

    …was diagnosed in June 2019 and died in April 2020. His work history included the Navy, the Air Force, General Electric, Stone and Webster, and automotive work. The claim against Hunter Sales concerned gaskets at the…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · June 17, 2021

    Gay v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)

    …law, a plaintiff must show exposure to the defendant's product and that it was a substantial factor in causing the injury. A general recollection of a product's name, its presence on a ship, or…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · April 20, 2012 · in the opinion

    Ruppel v. AO Smith Corporation (2012)

    …Pumps and Peerless Pumps; Foster Wheeler Energy Corp., individually and as successor-in-interest to C.H. Wheeler; Garden Denver, Inc.; General Electric Co.; Georgia-Pacific, LLC; Goulds Pumps, Inc.; Honeywell International Inc., as successor-in…

  8. Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 26, 2013 · in the opinion

    Friedman v. AO Smith Corp. (2013)

    …breakers, as well as specialty and explosion-proof equipment. Among other things, Mr. Friedman testified that he purchased electrical supplies and equipment from Graybar. In this regard, Mr. Friedman testified as follows (plaintiffs' exhibit B, pp…

  9. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 25, 2016 · in the opinion

    Campbell v. AO Smith Corporation (2016)

    …CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, F/K/A VIACOM INC., SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO CBS CORPORATION, A PENNSYLVANIA CORPORATION, F/K/A WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION; CHAMPLAIN CABLE CORPORATION, AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO HERCULES INC; COLUMBUS MCKINNON…

  10. Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 18, 2017 · in the opinion

    Macaluso v. A.O. Smith Corp. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …rock, floor tiles, and electrical equipment), and also while employed as a plumber's helper (from boilers and boiler insulation) during the period 1972 to 1982. Eugene Story-(deceased) Was exposed to Asbestos dust from valves…

  11. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · March 28, 2001 · in the opinion

    Abadie v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (2001)

    …and Johnny Johnson. CBS Corporation, formerly known as Westinghouse Electric Corporation (hereinafter referred to as Westinghouse), settled and dismissed their appeals with all plaintiffs but Earlven Gauthe and Johnny Johnson after oral argument, but days before…

  12. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · January 26, 2022 · in the opinion

    Smith v. AO Smith Corp. (2022)

    …However, these four companies were engaged in engineering design, facility and property management services, electrical contracting, and equipment rental—distinct lines of business from the plumbing and mechanical contracting work of Schneider, Inc. and Pittsburgh Mechanical…

  13. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · February 1, 1999 · in the opinion

    Owens Corning v. Bauman (1999)

    …it is not within our purview to usurp [\766] the legislative function of the General Assembly or to overrule a decision of the Court of Appeals. Maryland Declaration of Rights and Maryland Constitution Amicus White Lung…

  14. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · February 1, 2011

    Cone v. Agco Corp. (2011)

    …trial. It argued first that it could not be liable for engines made before 1988, when it bought assets from a General Motors division. It argued second that it made no asbestos products after 1988. The…

  15. Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 9, 2014

    Houston v. AO Smith Corp. (2014)

    The court granted general contractor Morse Diesel's motion for summary judgment and dismissed all claims and cross-claims against it; the action continued against the remaining defendants. A general contractor is not liable under Labor…

  16. Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 18, 2019

    Babcock v. Watts Water Technologies (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …a Delaware company based in Massachusetts and did not exist before 1985. The court found it had preserved the defense in its answer but held there was no general jurisdiction in New York. On specific jurisdiction…

  17. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · February 25, 1999 · in the opinion

    Owens Corning v. Walatka (1999)

    …For the reasons discussed below, we conclude that the general rule imposing the burden on the plaintiff should be applied in this case against appellees. A. THE BURDEN TO ESTABLISH THAT THE STATUTORY CAP DOES NOT…

  18. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 26, 1999 · in the opinion

    Howard v. Owens Corning (1999)

    …emotional distress, intentional tort, conspiracy [\389] and loss of consortium; and sought general, special and punitive damages against no fewer than 215 named defendants and 300 unnamed does. Specifically, the complaint alleged that as a result…

  19. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · May 17, 2004 · in the opinion

    In re Kensington International Limited (2004)

    …a distinction between newly-appointed and veteran judges; the general prohibition against ex part e communications on the merits applies to all judges. As for the second safeguard, we must first assume that all parties took…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · March 31, 2005 · in the opinion

    Owens Corning v. Credit Suisse First Boston (2005)

    …jurisdictions, to deter tortious conduct which ended more than twenty years ago. Adjusting the Forecast to Account for Changed Conditions There is general agreement that the values assigned to valid claims for mesothelioma, lung cancer, and…