No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

4 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · April 19, 1982 · in the opinion

    Beshada v. Johns-Manville Products Corp. (1982)

    …Rather, defendants state, the cost "will be borne by the public at large and reflected in a general, across the board increase in premiums to compensate for unanticipated risks." There is some truth in this assertion…

  2. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 30, 2004

    Gilbert v. Monsey Products Co. (2004)

    …exposure was regular and frequent enough to cause the injury was a question for the jury. The court vacated the judgments and remanded. One judge concurred in the result, finding Eckenrod's general principles still applicable.

  3. Court case · U.S. Supreme Court · June 25, 1997 · in the opinion

    Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor (1997)

    "But the settlement does more than simply provide a general recovery fund," the Court of Appeals immediately added; "\[r\]ather, it makes important judgments on how recovery is to be allocated among different kinds of plaintiffs…

  4. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 30, 2004 · in the opinion

    Gilbert v. Monsey Products Company (2004)

    …1988). In this case, I find the general principles of Eckenrod applicable. Where appellant himself testified about his exposure to the appellees' products and provided sufficient evidence of product identification, the trial court's grant of…